2009
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.050658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Promiscuous Conformational Switch in the Secondary Multidrug Transporter MdfA

Abstract: Multidrug (Mdr) transporters are membrane proteins that actively export structurally dissimilar drugs from the cell, thereby rendering the cell resistant to toxic compounds. Similar to substrate-specific transporters, Mdr transporters also undergo substrate-induced conformational changes. However, the mechanism by which a variety of dissimilar substrates are able to induce similar transport-compatible conformational responses in a single transporter remains unclear. To address this major aspect of Mdr transpor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, MdtM is a dynamic protein that undergoes conformational change during the drug efflux event 4 26 ; it is therefore probable that substrate interacts with other residues as it initially ‘explores’ the binding cavity of the protein 27 28 and subsequently translocates through the pore during the transport event. Such substrate-interacting residues have been identified in other MFS transporters 9 11 17 25 29 30 31 32 33 , and that information along with our MdtM model was used to guide identification of functionally related but not necessarily conserved residues in the latter 34 . This approach yielded an additional five residues (Q33, T120, M232, F261, and K342) as candidates for functioning in a substrate recognition/binding role in MdtM ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In reality, MdtM is a dynamic protein that undergoes conformational change during the drug efflux event 4 26 ; it is therefore probable that substrate interacts with other residues as it initially ‘explores’ the binding cavity of the protein 27 28 and subsequently translocates through the pore during the transport event. Such substrate-interacting residues have been identified in other MFS transporters 9 11 17 25 29 30 31 32 33 , and that information along with our MdtM model was used to guide identification of functionally related but not necessarily conserved residues in the latter 34 . This approach yielded an additional five residues (Q33, T120, M232, F261, and K342) as candidates for functioning in a substrate recognition/binding role in MdtM ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To this end, the affinity of purified, detergent-solubilized MdfA for its substrate tetraphenylphosphonium (TPP) was measured under various pH values, utilizing an intrinsic fluorescence assay that probes TPP-binding by its quenching effect on MdfA’s fluorescence (Fluman et al, 2009) (Figure S1A). Under increasing proton concentrations, the affinity for TPP was reduced (Figure 1A), indicating that high proton concentrations interfere with substrate binding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TPP binding was measured as described (Fluman et al, 2009), with minor modifications described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the fluorescent cross-linking reagent must be a pump substrate. Fortunately, several such cross-linking compounds are available, such as MTS-rhodamine ( Loo and Clarke, 2002 ), BODIPY-FL-maleimide ( Husain et al, 2011 ), N -ethylmaleimide ( Loo and Clarke, 2002 ; Guan and Kaback, 2007 ), or monobromobimane ( Fluman et al, 2009 ). Thus, this approach could prove to be very useful for MOA studies for EPIs.…”
Section: Approaches To Study the Mechanism Of Action Of Epismentioning
confidence: 99%