2006
DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2006.12087989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Promising Approach for Expanding and Sustaining School-Wide Positive Behavior Support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
340
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 715 publications
(357 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
340
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In institutional settings, for example, Patterson and colleagues (1992) found that peers provided nine positive reinforcements to every one positive reinforcement for a prosocial behavior provided by staff (Buehler, Patterson, & Furniss, 1973). There are several evidence-based school programs that effectively focus on increasing the ambient rate of positive reinforcement to students for behavior that promotes academic achievement and engagement, including positive behavior intervention support (Sugai & Horner, 2006) and the Good Behavior Game (Barrish, Saunders, & Wolf, 1969; Kellam, Keegan, Kendziora, & Poduska, 2002). There is often, however, a gap between universal interventions such as these and the needs of high-risk students are who already presenting with problem behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In institutional settings, for example, Patterson and colleagues (1992) found that peers provided nine positive reinforcements to every one positive reinforcement for a prosocial behavior provided by staff (Buehler, Patterson, & Furniss, 1973). There are several evidence-based school programs that effectively focus on increasing the ambient rate of positive reinforcement to students for behavior that promotes academic achievement and engagement, including positive behavior intervention support (Sugai & Horner, 2006) and the Good Behavior Game (Barrish, Saunders, & Wolf, 1969; Kellam, Keegan, Kendziora, & Poduska, 2002). There is often, however, a gap between universal interventions such as these and the needs of high-risk students are who already presenting with problem behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study demonstrates how one state was able to influence the practices of well over 100 schools by working with districts to adopt the implementation practices needed to install evidence-based instructional and behavioral strategies. Adoption meets Sugai and Horner's (2006) four primary adoption considerations: (a) the systems have been shown effective as are the EBPs they support, by definition; (b) they are efficient and combining them improves their efficiency; (c) they are highly relevant as they address the needs of both teachers and their students; and (d) once in place, the systems can be durably sustained provided schools personnel receive the supports they need from their districts, administrators, and specialists. Resources, such as SISEP and NIRN's active implementation frameworks (2013-2017), have been developed to describe how to use implementation drivers, teams, and stages along with fidelity assessments and improvement cycles to iteratively expand the use of tiered systems and EBPs within them as they were intended.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we propose greater integration between the mentoring program and existing tiered systems of support. These systems, such as positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS 38 ) or expanded school mental health (SMH 39 ) services, are implemented within schools in increasing frequency and involve the coordination and support of various professionals who are native to the school. As coordinators, we often found it challenging to help address the needs of this population without the support and involvement of other school professionals, including school counselors and psychologists, and social workers.…”
Section: Considerations For Future Research and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%