2018
DOI: 10.1088/1674-4527/18/10/126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proper motion study of the globular cluster M12 (NGC 6218)

Abstract: Using astrometric techniques developed by Anderson et al., we determine proper motions (PMs) in ∼14.60×16.53 arcmin 2 area of the kinematically "thick-disk" globular cluster M12. The cluster's proximity and sparse nature makes it a suitable target for ground-based telescopes. Archive images with time gap of ∼ 11.1 years were observed with wide-field imager (WFI) mosaic camera mounted on ESO 2.2 m telescope. The median value of PM error in both components is ∼ 0.7 mas yr −1 for the stars having V ≤ 20 mag. PMs … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the method presented by Balaguer-Núñez et al (1998) to determined the membership probabilities. This method was previously used for open and globular clusters (Sariya et al 2018(Sariya et al , 2021aBisht et al 2020Bisht et al , 2021Bisht et al , 2022. Sariya et al (2018) give a detailed description of this method.…”
Section: Membership Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the method presented by Balaguer-Núñez et al (1998) to determined the membership probabilities. This method was previously used for open and globular clusters (Sariya et al 2018(Sariya et al , 2021aBisht et al 2020Bisht et al , 2021Bisht et al , 2022. Sariya et al (2018) give a detailed description of this method.…”
Section: Membership Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A circle of 0.3, 0.6, 0.4, 0.4, and 0.3 mas yr −1 for clusters Pi 2, Pi 3, Pi 7, Pi 12, and Pi 15, respectively, around the distribution of cluster stars in the VPDs, characterizes our membership criteria. The selected radius in VPDs compromises losing cluster members with poor PMs and including field region stars (Sariya et al 2018). The cluster's member stars are gravitationally bound, so they show a very narrow spread in parallaxes compared to field stars in parallax versus magnitude plots (Angelo et al 2020).…”
Section: Mean Proper Motion and Field Star Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is required to separate field stars from the cluster member stars to estimate the physical and dynamical parameters of the clusters (e.g., Dias et al 2018aDias et al , 2018bSariya et al 2018;Bisht et al 2021b;Sariya et al 2021;Bisht et al 2021aBisht et al , 2022. We have adopted the approach given by Balaguer-Núñez et al (1998) by using the PM database from the Gaia EDR3 catalog to determine the membership of stars in Pismis clusters.…”
Section: Membership Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%