2020
DOI: 10.1080/0960085x.2020.1793697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposal for minimum reusability evaluation of design principles

Abstract: Many Design Science Research (DSR) papers in Information Systems (IS) suggest sets of design principles (DPs) that provide knowledge for creating instances, in different contexts, of IT artifacts that belong to the same class. However, despite frameworks for evaluating DSR contributions, the evaluation of DP reusability to, with and for practitioners has been largely neglected. We suggest that in order to maintain the practical relevance of DSR, papers with DPs as their key outcomes should contain a reusabilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Steps such as the facilitated formulation of a design principle, data collection strategies, data processing steps, and the selection of models to use are relevant issues for every designer facing a similar challenge. Additionally, by using the schema proposed by Gregor et al [45], our design principle also meets the five criteria for reusability: accessibility, importance, novelty, and effectiveness [87]. Therefore, we expect that other DSS designers can build from this experience when defining intervention groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Steps such as the facilitated formulation of a design principle, data collection strategies, data processing steps, and the selection of models to use are relevant issues for every designer facing a similar challenge. Additionally, by using the schema proposed by Gregor et al [45], our design principle also meets the five criteria for reusability: accessibility, importance, novelty, and effectiveness [87]. Therefore, we expect that other DSS designers can build from this experience when defining intervention groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first version of the design principles, a method under development, was evaluated in three semi-structured interviews with four representatives of future providers (two small municipalities) and three members of a team of experienced intermediaries (a Belgian digital start-up that developed an OGD based application for the group of users whose information needs were investigated in iteration 1 and 2) (see Appendix E). As the design principles were reaching their final form in the artifact V.3., as presented in this paper and the current popular science article, they were evaluated based on the design principles evaluation framework of Iivari et al (2020). The popular science article, together with a questionnaire (online form) was sent to six experienced data providers, as a way to complement the feedback got from less experienced data providers (respondents of the first evaluation and participants of the iteration 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For research, the conceptual schema of Gregor et al (2020) and evaluation framework of Iivari et al (2020) offered a relevant structure to write and evaluate design principles. Moreover, more research of OGD from an information needs perspective is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations