1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf02378129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposal for sealing deformation joints on hydraulic engineering structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1973
1973

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…J e h (2) in which ~: is the safety factor, taken as 1.1-2.0 depending upon the operating conditions, considering that the more pronounced the texture of the mastic, the higher the value of r; t is the design period; and v is the constant rate of opening of the joint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…J e h (2) in which ~: is the safety factor, taken as 1.1-2.0 depending upon the operating conditions, considering that the more pronounced the texture of the mastic, the higher the value of r; t is the design period; and v is the constant rate of opening of the joint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At most hydraulic developments built on soft compressible foundations an established practice at the present time is the waterproofing of construction joints with asphalt seals having a cavity measuring 1.5 x 1.2 m (seals used at the Volgostroi). The waterproofing of the joints with asphalt seals 80 x 100 cm in cross section at the Bratsk hydroelectric plant and 60 x 80 cm in cross section at the Plyaviusk hydroelectric plant [3], although sufficiently reliable, was so complicated that at the Krasnoyarsk and Ust'-Ilimsk dams asphalt seals were not used, and the joints were waterproofed with metal compensators.The development, in recent years, of fundamentally new asphalt-polymer waterproofing materials [3] opens up new prospects for the use of superficial asphalt seals under a sharply continental climate [2].At the Sarrans darn in France (1936, height 114.5 m), the joints were waterproofed by means of a reinforcedconcrete beam 1 x 1 m in cross section with an adjacent asphalt seal 7 x 21 m in cross section. Although this seal …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation