1989
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(89)90541-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposal for the onset of chip segmentation in machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[34,35]). The most classical of them are the chip segmentation frequency and the chip segmentation length.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Chip Segmentation Intensity Using The New mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[34,35]). The most classical of them are the chip segmentation frequency and the chip segmentation length.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Chip Segmentation Intensity Using The New mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…), while up to 90th analytical approaches are the main proposed analyses (e.g. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]). Using an analytical modelling, Sowerby and Chandrasekaran [34] proposed a factor based on the damage accumulation, to detect the onset of chip segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obtaining complete stress solutions become imperative, in order to use the grid distortion data to estimate damage during upset forging and to predict failure (Sowerby and Chandrasekaran 1986a, b). Other applications that demand complete solutions include predictions relating to chip segmentation during machining (Sowerby and Chandrasekaran 1989), machinability (Sathyanarayanan et al 1989;Subramanian et al 1987), etc. based on a void growth model (Sowerby and Chandrasekaran 1986a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sowerby and Chandrasekaran [24] presented a method to predict the chip segmentation using a critical damage factor. Later, Marusich and Ortiz [25] estimated the crack propagation in serrated chip using the dynamic fracture factor together with the maximum loop stress criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%