2017
DOI: 10.1109/tla.2017.7854609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposal of Project of PI controller gains used on the Control of Doubly-Fed Induction Generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the stator power can be manipulated by controlling the rotor current as: Likewise, expressions for active P and reactive Q powers of the stator in this synchronous frame, are given by (7) and (8), in this way:…”
Section: Double-fed Induction Generator Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the stator power can be manipulated by controlling the rotor current as: Likewise, expressions for active P and reactive Q powers of the stator in this synchronous frame, are given by (7) and (8), in this way:…”
Section: Double-fed Induction Generator Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, these gains are tuned by heuristic rules, which neglect the mathematical model, and thus, the performance of the controller may be affected due to this shortcoming [6]. To improve this weakness, Murari et al [7] designed a method for PI gains with admissible performance. Moreover, other alternatives that can be found in the literature, such as the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) method [8], using a linear model or the nonlinear sliding mode controller as shown in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the power flow can be increased by using control strategies, such as Stator Flux Oriented (SFO) or Stator Voltage Oriented (SVO) [12]. These strategies allow the control of active (P) and reactive (Q) powers of the stator that are injected into the grid by adjusting the rotor current, by means of Proportional Integral (PI) [16], predictive [17], deadbeat [7,18], or sliding mode [19] controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%