A Proposal on Initial Remote User Enrollment for IVR-based Voice Authentication Systems

Cabuk, Umut Can; Şenocak, Tuba; Demir, Eyyüp

doi:10.17148/ijarcce.2017.6722

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the user has a pc or a mobile device, or any device that can be connected to the internet, he can be capable of voting in a way which lawmakers and directors or managers will be capable of accessing the people's lowest conclusions. By this, real majority rule government will be accomplished automatically (Çabuk, Şenocak, Demir, & Çavdar, 2017). It is integral to be controlled without problems precisely in little towns, and certainly in more significant cities discovered in degenerate nations.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain as an E-Voting Tool

Fraij¹,

ALDabbas²,

Aburumman³

2020

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blockchain as a distributed system that confirms security and reliability have started a new era of a solid and consensus system.Blockchains focus on cryptocurrency is encouraging many other processes to follow the same reliable approach of security.Almost all procedures and operations are now invited to be electronically performed in the digital Ethereum network that has been presented. Moreover, this study proposed the use of an Ethereum network on a blockchain platform in the study when it was moved to a blockchain network to confirm transparency.An E-voting system sample has been tested by using an Ethereum network smart contracts inwhich solidity language and wallets were used. In the voting test, the Ethereum blockchain will be able to collect records in which voters can use their Ethereum wallets or android devices to submit their votes in a consensus node.The researchers studied the voting system taking Jordan as a case study.This study recommended the adaptation of e-voting to support transparency and voters trust to reduce corruption and unreliability in the voting processes. Moreover, the use of this system will allow a voter to vote from home in the time of the pandemic.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain as an E-Voting Tool

Fraij¹,

ALDabbas²,

Aburumman³

2020

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Providing this anonymity is also a major challenge in the current state-ofthe-art works. Hao et al in their work, proposed a solution based on the Diffie-Hellman process, which also implies the use of public/private key pairs and random numbers, so that a "two-round" referendum can supposedly be held with some ballot privacy [12] IV. CONCLUSION…”

Section: International Journal Of Engineering Research and Technology (mentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Voting using Blockchain Technology

Yadav¹

2020

IJERT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Democratic voting is a crucial and serious event in any country, the current voting scheme in any country is through ballot paper or by use of EVM. These processes have many drawbacks such as transparency, low voter turnout , tampering of votes, distrust in the election body, forging of unique Id (voter id card), delay in giving out results and the most important is security issues. Security of digital voting is always the biggest concern when considering to implement a digital voting system. With such monumental decisions at stake, there can be no doubt about the system's ability to secure data and defend against potential attacks. One way the security issues can be potentially solved is through the use of blockchain technology. Blockchain technology offers infinite number of applications. Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that allows digital assets to be transacted in a peer-to-peer decentralized network. A distributed ledger technology is an exciting advancement in this regard. Block is a collection of all the transactions. Blockchain possess salient features such as immutability, Decentralization, Security, Transparency and anonymity. Blockchain with smart contracts emerges as a promising candidate for building a safer, secure and transparent E-voting systems. In this paper we have implemented and tested a sample e-voting application as a smart contract for the Ethereum network using the blockchain technology through wallets and the Solidity language. Limited amount of token(gas) is given in the wallet which is exhausted when the user votes thus preventing duplicity of votes. This paper also highlights the pros and cons of using blockchain technology and also demonstrates a practical system by showcasing a webapp for voting and its limitations.

show abstract

“…This also explains why Estonia still holds both traditional and online elections together. Several studies showed that the trust in such electronic voting systems are considerably low (or at least not high as the traditional systems) [23], and some institutions and researchers started to propose ways to improve that trust already [24][25]. The trust in e-voting, if can be increased successfully, would even increase the overall trust to the general political system, especially in the developing countries [26].…”

Section: B Social Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Feasibility and Suitability of Blockchain Techniques for the E-Voting Systems

Cabuk¹,

Adiguzel²,

Karaarslan³

2018

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Comm

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the second decade of the 21st century, blockchain definitely became one of the most trending computational technologies. This research aims to question the feasibility and suitability of using blockchain technology within e-voting systems, regarding both technical and non-technical aspects. In today's world, although the course of this spreading is considerably slow, several countries already use means of e-voting due to many social and economic reasons, which we further investigated. Nevertheless, the number of countries offering various e-government solutions, apart from e-voting, is significantly high. E-voting systems, naturally, require much more attention and assurance regarding potential security and anonymity issues, since voting is one of the few extremely critical governmental processes. Nevertheless, e-voting is not purely a governmental service, but many companies and nonprofit organizations would benefit the cost-efficiency, scalability, remote accessibility, and ease of use that it provides. Blockchain technology is claimed to be able to address some, obviously not all, important security concerns, including anonymity, confidentiality, integrity, and non-repudiation. The analysis results presented in this article mostly confirm these claims. and valid changes) could be provided during the election time. This should be implemented with a supporting consensus protocol. Security is further discussed in the following parts. B. Social AspectsApplications involving e-voting and the Blockchain technology have big social impacts, too. These impacts can further be listed as the value obtained from the provided ease of use and the people's perception of trust to these so-called "hitech" systems. Generally, the e-Government services enabled wider, easier, and faster access to the government services for the people, including the ones living in remote settlements and the ones who are very busy and/or mobile. So that it can be seen as a powerful tool that reinforces the government-citizen relationships [21]. While the e-Government itself is not directly related to the democracy, the concept of e-voting extends the e-Government to provide means of democracy, called e-Democracy. 132 applications. While this mechanism ensures the integrity and authentication of the user/voter accounts, authenticating the users themselves remains as an open problem. E. Comparison with AlternativesWhile there are hundreds of different e-Government applications and services, throughout the world, we cannot claim the same for e-voting systems, there aren't many to compare. Even so, we compared the distributed model of the blockchain scheme with centralized solutions, mostly referring to the Estonia model, which is one of the few successful applications so far.Since the application in Estonia is a full off-the-shelf solution, a blockchain based variation shall not totally replace all the methods used in parts of that system. For example, a blockchain based solution itself would not provide a brandnew personal ID authentication mechan...

show abstract

A Proposal on Initial Remote User Enrollment for IVR-based Voice Authentication Systems

Cited by 7 publications

References 8 publications

Blockchain as an E-Voting Tool

Blockchain as an E-Voting Tool

E-Voting using Blockchain Technology

A Survey on Feasibility and Suitability of Blockchain Techniques for the E-Voting Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About