A Proposed q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy-Based Decision Support System for Comparing Marketing Automation Modules for Higher Education Admission

Biswas, Sanjib; Pamučar, Dragan; Raj, Akanksha; Kar, Samarjit

doi:10.1007/978-981-19-8493-8_66

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, the formulated portfolio offers the performance values as given in table 7. To ascertain that the results generated by the CRADIS method is reliable, a comparison with other MCDM models (while using the same criteria weights) is carried out as demonstrated in the past studies [80][81][82][83]. The Spearman's Rank correlation test among the ranking provided by CRADIS and other MCDM models such as COPRAS, MABAC and TOPSIS shows a significant (two tailed at 0.05 level) correlation coefficient values like 1.00, 0.94, 0.89 respectively.…”

Section: Comparison Of Evolutionary Algorithmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of Appropriate Portfolio Optimization Strategy

Das,

Chaudhuri,

Roy

et al. 2023

Theor. Appl. Comput. Intell.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Portfolio optimization is a critical task in financial management, aiming to maximize expected returns while minimizing risk. This study compares the performance of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Dynamic Programming (DP), and Differential Evolutionary Algorithm (DEA) in optimizing portfolios in the NIFTY 50 market. Using daily stock data from March 2023 to May 2023, we evaluate the algorithms based on performance metrics including the Sharpe ratio, expected return, volatility and Sortino ratio. Then an integrated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework of Logarithmic Percentage Change-driven Objective Weighting (LOPCOW) and Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution (CRADIS) methods has been used to compare the evolutionary algorithms for portfolio optimization. The results show that PSO outperforms the other algorithms in terms of Sharpe Ratio and Expected Return, while DEA exhibits the lowest portfolio risk. Furthermore, the efficient frontier analysis confirms PSO's ability to generate portfolios with higher expected returns at the same risk level. This research highlights the effectiveness of optimization algorithms in portfolio management and provides valuable insights for investors and portfolio managers in maximizing returns and managing risks.

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Evolutionary Algorithmsmentioning

confidence: 99%