A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain

Abstract

Background and purpose Outcome measurement has been shown to improve performance in several fields of healthcare. This understanding has driven a growing interest in value-based healthcare, where value is defined as outcomes achieved per money spent. While low back pain (LBP) constitutes an enormous burden of disease, no universal set of metrics has yet been accepted to measure and compare outcomes. Here, we aim to define such a set.Patients and methods An international group of 22 specialists in several disciplines of spine care was assembled to review literature and select LBP outcome metrics through a 6-round modified Delphi process. The scope of the outcome set was degenerative lumbar conditions.Results Patient-reported metrics include numerical pain scales, lumbar-related function using the Oswestry disability index, health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, and questions assessing work status and analgesic use. Specific common and serious complications are included. Recommended follow-up intervals include 6, 12, and 24 months after initiating treatment, with optional follow-up at 3 months and 5 years. Metrics for risk stratification are selected based on pre-existing tools.Interpretation The outcome measures recommended here are structured around specific etiologies of LBP, span a patient’s entire cycle of care, and allow for risk adjustment. Thus, when implemented, this set can be expected to facilitate meaningful comparisons and ultimately provide a continuous feedback loop, enabling ongoing improvements in quality of care. Much work lies ahead in implementation, revision, and validation of this set, but it is an essential first step toward establishing a community of LBP providers focused on maximizing the value of the care we deliver.

Defining an International Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Consensus of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Working Group

“…The standard ICHOM question for evaluating work status was recommended 31. The exact question and response options are shown in Table 1.…”

Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics

“…The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiatives provide methodological guidance, including a stepwise approach, for the development of a COS . Several examples of COSs that have been developed for orthopaedic conditions and procedures include: Degenerative lumbar conditions, non‐specific low back pain, post‐surgical knee pain, hip fractures, shoulder pain, and distal radius fractures . There are many additional areas where COSs are needed in orthopaedics.…”

“…There are many instruments available, many PROMs, that can be used in most areas of orthopaedics (e.g., Refs …”

The Digital Outcome Measure

“…Another measure is the "percentage of low back pain patients who received magnetic resonance imaging" [18]. Examples of outcome measures, which more directly represent patients' interests [19], include "disability status" and "ability to work." Most actual current outcome measurements in practice are not granular condition-specific metrics, but reflect blunt outcomes such as mortality.…”