2021
DOI: 10.5209/cmpl.76453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A propósito del poblamiento aborigen en Gran Canaria. Demografía, dinámica social y ocupación del territorio

Abstract: Este trabajo aborda el estudio de la dinámica poblacional y demográfica de la ocupación prehispánica de Gran Canaria. Para ello se ha recurrido al análisis de la distribución del sumatorio de probabilidad de las dataciones radiocarbónicas procedentes, en este caso, de contextos funerarios. Los resultados obtenidos se compararon con dos modelos teóricos nulos de crecimiento poblacional, tratando de explicarlos teniendo en cuenta la información arqueológica disponible, en relación con los cambios diacrónicos reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying this faster rate to calculate the coalescent ages for those aboriginal lineages that remain represented today (Table S4), revealed molecular ages between 2,300 and 2,185 years ago for the two oldest lineages, H1cf and H1e1a (Table S4), that is, two or three centuries BD. These molecular ages are earlier than the recent archaeological estimates, dating the first settlement of the Canary Islands to two or three centuries AD 50 , but are much closer to each other than those previously proposed 12 . On the other hand, age differences among lineages, and their heterogeneous settlements on the islands, gives us some clues to resolve other intriguing questions such as whether the Archipelago was colonized in one or several immigration waves, or whether the pre-conquest settlers arose from one or more genetically heterogeneous populations.…”
Section: Molecular Age For a Permanent Aboriginal Settlementsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Applying this faster rate to calculate the coalescent ages for those aboriginal lineages that remain represented today (Table S4), revealed molecular ages between 2,300 and 2,185 years ago for the two oldest lineages, H1cf and H1e1a (Table S4), that is, two or three centuries BD. These molecular ages are earlier than the recent archaeological estimates, dating the first settlement of the Canary Islands to two or three centuries AD 50 , but are much closer to each other than those previously proposed 12 . On the other hand, age differences among lineages, and their heterogeneous settlements on the islands, gives us some clues to resolve other intriguing questions such as whether the Archipelago was colonized in one or several immigration waves, or whether the pre-conquest settlers arose from one or more genetically heterogeneous populations.…”
Section: Molecular Age For a Permanent Aboriginal Settlementsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Nevertheless, recent interdisciplinary research, involving both radiometric dating (Alberto, Delgado, Moreno & Velasco, 2019;Velasco-Vázquez, Alberto-Barroso, Delgado-Darias & Moreno-Benítez, 2021) and paleogenomics (Fregel et al, 2019) has caused some to take in account the population wave hypothesis once again.…”
Section: The Canarian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pre-Hispanic times, the Canary Islands' aboriginal population had a mixed subsistence economy, with differences from island to island. In Gran Canaria, current evidence points to the practice of agropastoralism, combining livestock and agricultural practices, 12 including irrigation and possibly intensifying the exploitation of marine resources in the final centuries of the pre-Hispanic period. 13 , 14 , 15 Paleobotanical evidence indicates that the main cultigens were barley ( Hordeum vulgare , the predominant cultigen), durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), lentils ( Lens culinaris ), broad beans ( Vicia faba ), peas ( Pisum sativum ), and figs ( Ficus carica ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%