2000
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200001000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective and Randomized Study, “SVEA,” Comparing Effects of Three Methods for Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life, Patient-Defined Problem Areas of Life, and Cosmetic Result

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of abdominal complications (Table II) was overall in agreement with those reported in earlier published reports, which does vary according to the different parameters included [18][19][20][21][22][23]. The majority of the complications observed were attributable to a compromised tissue perfusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The incidence of abdominal complications (Table II) was overall in agreement with those reported in earlier published reports, which does vary according to the different parameters included [18][19][20][21][22][23]. The majority of the complications observed were attributable to a compromised tissue perfusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Improved ptosis of the reconstructed breast was expected, as the LTD ap transfer adds extra tissue laterally. The good values for scars were more unexpected, but con rm another Swedish study "SVEA'', in which patients who had LTD ap reconstructions were more satis ed with their scars than women who had latissimus dorsi aps or pedicled TRAM aps (7). It may re ect the importance of locating the scar lines in the lateral part of the breast, where they are less conspicuous.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This con rms most evaluations including the patient's assessment of the result of their breast reconstruction (7). Three of four women felt that the reconstructed breast was a part of the body and everyone would recommend the operation to another woman after mastectomy, despite the fact that most assessed the reconstructed breast as rmer than the normal one and found the touch and sexual sensation reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Subjective evaluation, which is reported in most studies, includes patients' satisfaction, or an assessment of patient images by a jury [6][7][8][9][10]. Objective evaluation involves measurement of volume by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), mammography, water displacement, plastic cups, or thermoplastic casts, and assessment of shape and symmetry by anatomical measurements [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%