1994
DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199410000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Comparative Study of the Compression Hip Screw and the Gamma Nail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
37
3
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
37
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…While comparative studies between the Gamma nail and hip compression screw have shown that the Gamma nail was associated with significant learning curves [19], details of the learning curves have not previously been examined. The aim of this study was to delineate the learning curves of residents learning hip fracture surgery using the cephalomedullary nail, cannulated screw fixation and hemiarthroplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While comparative studies between the Gamma nail and hip compression screw have shown that the Gamma nail was associated with significant learning curves [19], details of the learning curves have not previously been examined. The aim of this study was to delineate the learning curves of residents learning hip fracture surgery using the cephalomedullary nail, cannulated screw fixation and hemiarthroplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intramedullary fixation by nailing is more useful in unstable and reverse oblique patterns because it has better axial telescoping and rotational stability as it is a load shearing device [11] . The proximal femoral nail and intramedullary hip screw have their own complications like increased radiation risk, high cost and higher learning curve [14,15,16] . The disadvantages of arthroplasty include more extensive surgery and the frequent necessity to use calcar replacing [10,17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixation with dynamic hip screw is the most common technique in the literature and for most of the surgeons is gold standard as well (3)(4)(5). Failure of dynamic hip screws especially in unstable fractures led to the use of proximal femoral nails which were designed after 1990's (6)(7)(8). After 2000's proximal femoral nails have been revised and, because of their biomechanical advantages, preferred very commonly especially in the unstable hip fractures with medial calcar discontinuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 2000's proximal femoral nails have been revised and, because of their biomechanical advantages, preferred very commonly especially in the unstable hip fractures with medial calcar discontinuity. However studies reporting complications related with this technique started to come out with the common use of these implants (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Reported complications are cut-out, medial migration of the lag screw, perforation of the femoral head, malunion in varus position, nonunion, avascular necrosis, implant failure, neurovascular injuries and stress fracture distal to the nail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%