2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-005-9006-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Examination of High-cost Health Services Utilization among Drug using Prisoners Reentering the Community

Abstract: The use of health services by prisoners during their incarceration and after their return to the community impacts the U.S. health care system and health care costs associated with this system. These health care costs are expected to increase over the next decade as more prisoners return to their communities. The current study prospectively examines the use of high-cost health care services-emergency room visits and hospitalizations-among 565 male drug-abusing prisoners about 1 year after prison release. A ser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings support Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, as well as the literature on health care use patterns among people with criminal justice involvement (Andersen, 1995; Harzke et al, 2006; Leukefeld et al, 2006; Webster et al, 2005), that is, predisposing characteristics such as gender, enabling resources such as having health insurance, and need (in this study’s case, mental health and drug problem histories, which suggest the need for specific kinds of treatments) are associated with several types of preincarceration health care use among women and men in jail. Andersen’s goal in developing a model of health care use was to provide a framework through which researchers could empirically assess the multiple levels of influence on patterns of health service use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our findings support Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, as well as the literature on health care use patterns among people with criminal justice involvement (Andersen, 1995; Harzke et al, 2006; Leukefeld et al, 2006; Webster et al, 2005), that is, predisposing characteristics such as gender, enabling resources such as having health insurance, and need (in this study’s case, mental health and drug problem histories, which suggest the need for specific kinds of treatments) are associated with several types of preincarceration health care use among women and men in jail. Andersen’s goal in developing a model of health care use was to provide a framework through which researchers could empirically assess the multiple levels of influence on patterns of health service use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The current study is part of a larger project that focused on health service utilization among incarcerated drug abusers when they return to the community after incarceration (e.g., Hiller et al, 2009; Leukefeld et al, 2006; Webster, Mateyoke-Scrivner, Stanton, Leukefeld, 2007). Baseline interview data collection was completed in four different Kentucky state correctional facilities when participants were incarcerated (Wave 1) and follow-up data collection interviews were conducted about one-year after participants were released from prison (Wave 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A history of incarceration has been associated with a higher prevalence of infectious disease including HIV and STIs; mental illness; and substance abuse and dependency (Davis & Pacchiana, 2004; Fazel et al 2006; Fisher et al 2006; Wilper et al 2009); a higher prevalence of chronic diseases (Binswanger et al 2009; Davis & Pacchiana, 2004; Hawkins et al 2010; Wang & Green, 2010), and a higher risk of death (Binswanger et al 2007). The poor health status of reentry populations also led to use of high-cost health services (Leukefeld et al 2006). Longer and more severe criminal history was associated with poorer physical health and use of the ED (Mateyoke-Scrivner et al 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%