2020
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-Fluciclovine With 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in PET/CT: A Special Aspect in Imaging Local Recurrence: Reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall positivity rate of 18 F-fluciclovine PET was 59% in a published study (6). Similarly, higher positivity rates were seen for PSMA-based radiotracers in head-to-head direct comparisons of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 to 18 F-fluciclovine (23,24). Interestingly, we report 3 patients with prostate bed uptake on 18 F-fluciclovine PET who had multiple extrapelvic lesions but no prostate bed lesion identified on 18 F-DCFPyL PET.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The overall positivity rate of 18 F-fluciclovine PET was 59% in a published study (6). Similarly, higher positivity rates were seen for PSMA-based radiotracers in head-to-head direct comparisons of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 to 18 F-fluciclovine (23,24). Interestingly, we report 3 patients with prostate bed uptake on 18 F-fluciclovine PET who had multiple extrapelvic lesions but no prostate bed lesion identified on 18 F-DCFPyL PET.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…12,15,16 Two recent studies have prospectively compared the performance of 18 F-fluciclovine and 68 Ga-PSMA with interesting findings. 29,30 Although Calais et al 29 reported 68 Ga-PSMA-11 to achieve higher overall detection (56%) than 18 F-fluciclovine (26%) in a single-center, low-PSA cohort (< 2 ng/ mL), Pernthaler et al 30 reported less variation between the detection rates achieved with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 (82.8 %) and 18 F-fluciclovine (79.3%). Pernthaler's cohort had a wider PSA range (median 4.1 ng/mL) than Calais'; however, when limiting to only those patients with a PSA 2 ng/mL, detection rates for 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-fluciclovine were still less varied (53% vs 42%, respectively) than in the Calais study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the preliminary analysis of an ongoing prospective study of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 and 18 F-fluciclovine that included 50 patients with BRPC after primary prostatectomy, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 demonstrated consistently higher detection rates than 18 F-Fluciclovine in all anatomic regions: prostate bed (20% vs. 12%, respectively), pelvic nodes (37% vs. 14%), extra-pelvic nodes (8% vs. 2%), skeleton (8% vs. 2%), and visceral organs (6% vs. 2%) [ 19 ]. In a study comparing 68 Ga-PSMA-11 with 18 F-Fluciclovine, Pernthaler et al observed almost equivalent detection rates for distant metastases, but poorer performance of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in detection of curable localized disease close to the bladder, possibly due to radiotracer accumulation [ 20 ].…”
Section: Uses and Impact Of Psma-targeted Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%