2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-02141-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective, interventional study comparing the outcomes of macular hole surgery in eyes randomized to C3F8, C2F6, or SF6 gas tamponade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Studies have shown that SF6 results in similar anatomical success rates for idiopathic macular holes compared with C3F8 and C2F6. 6,28 Compared with air, several studies have concluded that there is no significant difference between SF6 and air in the anatomical and functional prognosis of macular holes, at least in small-and medium-sized macular holes. 6,27,29,30 However, the mean face-down time of SF6 is longer than that of air.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Studies have shown that SF6 results in similar anatomical success rates for idiopathic macular holes compared with C3F8 and C2F6. 6,28 Compared with air, several studies have concluded that there is no significant difference between SF6 and air in the anatomical and functional prognosis of macular holes, at least in small-and medium-sized macular holes. 6,27,29,30 However, the mean face-down time of SF6 is longer than that of air.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%