2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing the Modified HM3 with the MODULITH® SLX-F2 Lithotripter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, the overall stone-free rate was 74.4%, which is lower than that reported in a recent ESWL series. 20 However, these results were obtained from one session and involved a short followup duration. Another limitation is that data pertaining to stone composition were not collected in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In our series, the overall stone-free rate was 74.4%, which is lower than that reported in a recent ESWL series. 20 However, these results were obtained from one session and involved a short followup duration. Another limitation is that data pertaining to stone composition were not collected in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In comparison with the original lens, both in vitro and in vivo results have demonstrated the advantage of the new lens with improved stone comminution and minimal tissue injury at a clinically relevant high output setting. The general principle in lens modification and associated implementation strategy described in this work are also applicable to design improvement of other EM lithotripters equipped with either convex lenses (37) or parabolic reflectors (38). The design and technical refinements of EM lithotripters from the late 1980s to middle 1990s were largely driven by empirical experience, practical concern for user convenience, and multifunctionality of the lithotripter system (39,40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition of SWL technology during this period from EH to predominately EM was carried out by lithotripter manufacturers with an incomplete understanding about the mechanisms of tissue injury and stone comminution in SWL (41). Consequently, clinical experience with the third-generation EM lithotripters, characterized by high p + and small FW, often resulted in low stone comminution efficiency with high retreatment rate compared with the original HM3 (9,38,41,42). Attempts to boost stone comminution by significantly augmenting the output pressure or energy of the lithotripter have been unsuccessful, which is likely associated with the greater risk of hematoma formation in the perirenal region at high output settings (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical experience has demonstrated that the treatment outcome of SWL depends critically on the design features and operating conditions of a lithotripter, with much emphasis given to the pulserepetition frequency (PRF) [3][4][5][6][7]. Even a slight increase in the PRF from 1 to 2 Hz is shown to significantly decrease the effectiveness of treatment [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%