1987
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198712000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Regional Versus Systemic Continuous 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Abstract: Sixty-four patients were entered into a randomized trial that evaluated intra-arterial (I.A.) versus intravenous (I.V.) 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) for colorectal liver metastases. There was a significant improved response rate for I.A. (62%) compared with I.V. (17%) treatment (p less than 0.003). However, the improved response rate for patients in whom I.A. therapy was used did not translate to a significantly improved survival rate. The 2-year actuarial survival rates for the groups for which I.A. and I.V. t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
183
0
11

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
183
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The other explanation pertains to the aggressiveness of the tumor itself, even though biomarkers associated with such a nature of the tumors have not been clarified yet and deserve further investigation. The negative impact of HLN metastasis on survival is in agreement with the report by Chang et al, 22 who demonstrated significantly shorter survival in patients with HLN metastasis (n 5 8) than in patients without HLN metastasis (n 5 18), all of whom were given hepatic arterial chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, their report is the only one available discussing the impact of HLN metastasis on the survival of patients with unresectable liver metastasis colorectal cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The other explanation pertains to the aggressiveness of the tumor itself, even though biomarkers associated with such a nature of the tumors have not been clarified yet and deserve further investigation. The negative impact of HLN metastasis on survival is in agreement with the report by Chang et al, 22 who demonstrated significantly shorter survival in patients with HLN metastasis (n 5 8) than in patients without HLN metastasis (n 5 18), all of whom were given hepatic arterial chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, their report is the only one available discussing the impact of HLN metastasis on the survival of patients with unresectable liver metastasis colorectal cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The remaining five studies (Kemeny M et al, 1986;Chang et al, 1987; Kemeny N et al, 1987;Hohn et al, 1989;Martin et al, 1990) compared intra-arterial therapy with conventional systemic chemotherapy. Overall, 41% of patients receiving intra-arterial treatment responded compared with only 14% of those receiving systemic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the vast majority of patients with hepatic metastases, resection is an inappropriate treatment. Chemotherapy administered systemically or regionally to the liver can produce response rates of 17% and 62% respectively (Chang et al, 1987 dearterialisation, embolisation and hepatic artery ligation can produce a limited reponse in selected patient groups at a cost of significant morbidity and no convincing survival benefits (Taylor, 1985;Bengmark, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%