O rthotopic liver transplant is the gold standard treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria (1, 2). Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) is widely accepted as a palliative treatment for patients who do not fulfill the criteria for OLT, HCC resection, or local therapies such as ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryotherapy, or electroporation (3-11). The usefulness of pre-OLT TACE to avoid disease progression while waiting for organ allocation and to down-stage selected patients to fulfill transplant criteria is well known. However, the effect of neoadjuvant TACE treatment prior to OLT for HCC on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) is contentious (2,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).Doxorubicin drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) is a drug delivery embolization system that can achieve higher tumor and lower systemic concentrations of doxorubicin compared with cTACE and demonstrated equal efficacy with low toxicity in previous clinical studies (23-27). However, the evidence to support the use of this relatively novel technique as a neoadjuvant treatment before OLT and its impact on OS and DFS is scarce.The aim of this study was to compare OS and DFS of patient undergoing OLT for HCC who did and did not receive neoadjuvant DEB-TACE.
Methods
Study design and populationData was investigated from a prospectively maintained database and the need to ob-
I N T E R V E N T I O N A L R A D I O LO G Y O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E
PURPOSEWe aimed to compare the overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma who did and did not have neoadjuvant doxorubicin drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).
METHODSThis is a retrospective study of 94 patients with HCC transplanted between 2000 and 2014 in a single tertiary center. Pre-and postoperative features, DFS and OS were compared between patients who received pre-OLT DEB-TACE (n=34, DEB-TACE group) and those who did not (n=60, non-TACE group). Radiologic and histologic response to neoadjuvant treatment as well as its complications were also studied.
RESULTSThere were no significant differences in post-transplantation DFS and OS rates between groups (5-year DFS: 70% in DEB-TACE group vs. 63% in non-TACE group, P = 0.454; 5-year OS: 70% in DEB-TACE group vs. 65% in non-TACE group, P = 0.532). The DEB-TACE group had longer OLT waiting time compared with the non-TACE group (110 vs. 72 days; P = 0.01). On univariate and multivariate analyses, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels >500 ng/mL prior to OLT were associated with decreased OS and DFS regardless of neoadjuvant approach (hazard ratio of 6, P = 0.001 and 5.5, P = 0.002, respectively).
CONCLUSIONPatients who underwent neoadjuvant DEB-TACE and OLT for hepatocellular carcinoma had no statistically different OS or DFS at 3 and 5 years from patients undergoing OLT alone.You may cite this article as: Dorcaratto D, Udupa V, Ho...