2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-018-0866-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective review on New Economic Geography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason is the understanding of interdependencies among many regions to guide empirical studies (Bosker, Brakman, Garretsen, and Schramm 2010). A two‐region set‐up overlooks the variability of market access across regions (Fujita and Thisse 2009), thus more complex spatial patterns may arise in a multi‐regional set‐up compared to a two‐region one (Fujita and Mori 2005; Fujita and Thisse 2009; Behrens and Robert‐Nicoud 2011; Akamatsu, Takayama, and Ikeda 2012; Gaspar 2018). As pointed out by Fujita, Krugman, and Venables (1999) and Berliant and Mori (2017), the consideration of only two regions stems from the advantage of dealing with more tractable problems, although it seems implausible that the geographical dimension of economic activity can be reduced to a 2‐region framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One reason is the understanding of interdependencies among many regions to guide empirical studies (Bosker, Brakman, Garretsen, and Schramm 2010). A two‐region set‐up overlooks the variability of market access across regions (Fujita and Thisse 2009), thus more complex spatial patterns may arise in a multi‐regional set‐up compared to a two‐region one (Fujita and Mori 2005; Fujita and Thisse 2009; Behrens and Robert‐Nicoud 2011; Akamatsu, Takayama, and Ikeda 2012; Gaspar 2018). As pointed out by Fujita, Krugman, and Venables (1999) and Berliant and Mori (2017), the consideration of only two regions stems from the advantage of dealing with more tractable problems, although it seems implausible that the geographical dimension of economic activity can be reduced to a 2‐region framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the interested reader to Gaspar (2018, Sec. 4.3) for a more detailed account of some of these and other works.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors showed that the growth rate of global economy is mainly related to the spatial repartition of an innovation sector across regions. Their conclusions confirm the existence of trade-off between efficiency and spatial equity (Gaspar 2018). In terms of public policy, there is a conflict between social cohesion and economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The inconsistency is a ubiquitous phenomenon in economic geography. The New Geo-Economics [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] explains that economic gathering of goods and services determines how population and capital flow spatially. These flow processes themselves tend to continuously self-strengthen.…”
Section: Determinants Of Cpementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williamson indicated that differences among regions in a country often showed a U-shape trend of changes against the improvement of economic development levels, i.e., regional differences typically decline first and then rise after reaching the bottom of the trend against economic development. The New Geo-Economics [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] explains that economic gathering of goods and services determines how population and capital flow spatially. These flow processes themselves tend to continuously self-strengthen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%