2020
DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.82205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study of a new prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean section at a tertiary care centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
2
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the failed VBAC, NRFHRP 87 (38.9%) and failed progress of labor, 72 (32.1%) were the main indications of emergency CS delivery. This finding is in line with a study done in Turkish 52 . More than half, (57.1%) of mothers gave birth within 8 h of the onset of labor with a mean of 9.4 ± 2.7 h for successful VBAC and 6.7 ± 2.9 h for failed TOLAC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the failed VBAC, NRFHRP 87 (38.9%) and failed progress of labor, 72 (32.1%) were the main indications of emergency CS delivery. This finding is in line with a study done in Turkish 52 . More than half, (57.1%) of mothers gave birth within 8 h of the onset of labor with a mean of 9.4 ± 2.7 h for successful VBAC and 6.7 ± 2.9 h for failed TOLAC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The success rate of VBAC in this study is lower relative to studies conducted in different countries: like Nigeria, India, China, Thailand, Vietnam and Iraq shows that the success rate of VBAC was > 50% 33 , 52 , 60 , 62 73 . This discrepancy indicates the presence of differences in the utilization of maternal health care services, such as ANC and PNC services, which are the main entry points to counsel women after CS delivery on the mode of delivery in their future pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Despite this, eight (8/17, 47%) of these unvalidated models were stated to be suitable for clinical use by their authors. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Five of the externally validated Grobman 2007 models altered the ethnicity predictor to reflect their population (eg, Annessi et al replaced Latina with Asian). These models are highlighted as Grobman 2007* in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, eight (8/17, 47%) of these unvalidated models were stated to be suitable for clinical use by their authors. 13–20…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El sistema de puntuación Flamm, desarrollado en 1997, se estructuró en base a los factores identificados durante el ingreso al nosocomio, como la edad materna inferior a 40 años (2 ptos), parto vaginal previo (antes y después de la cesárea 4 ptos, después de la cesárea 2 ptos, antes de la cesárea 1 pto y ausencia de parto vaginal preliminar 0 ptos), cesárea previa no motivada por falta de progresión (1 pto), borramiento del cérvix al ingreso (>75% -2 ptos, 25-75% -1 pto, <25% -0 pto) y dilatación cervical al ingreso ≥4 cm (1 pto). Si la suma de estos factores fluctúa entre 0-2 las probabilidades de éxito serán de 49%, 6-7 88% y 8-10 95% (punto de corte: 4-7 ptos) (16,22,23).…”
unclassified