2001
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-5-200109040-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Carriers of the Factor V Leiden Mutation To Determine the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract: The absolute annual incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation is low and does not justify routine screening of the families of symptomatic patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
113
2
25

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
113
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common (the most prevalent alteration, FVL is present in 1:25 of Caucasians) and associated with low risk (healthy individuals, who are heterozygous for FVL, are estimated to have approximately 0.6% annual risk of a DVT) (Middeldorp, 2001). Preventive strategies include avoidance of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy, prophylactic anti-coagulants in high risk situations, caution during long flights and avoidance of overweight and smoking.…”
Section: Genetic Exceptionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common (the most prevalent alteration, FVL is present in 1:25 of Caucasians) and associated with low risk (healthy individuals, who are heterozygous for FVL, are estimated to have approximately 0.6% annual risk of a DVT) (Middeldorp, 2001). Preventive strategies include avoidance of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy, prophylactic anti-coagulants in high risk situations, caution during long flights and avoidance of overweight and smoking.…”
Section: Genetic Exceptionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regions where prophylaxis is not administered according to accepted standards, family testing that includes accurate patient education and counseling may increase the appropriate use of prophylaxis in risk settings, thereby reducing the incidence of VT. If family testing is done in a region where prophylaxis is aggressively administered to all patients, it is unlikely that this testing will reduce the incidence of secondary VT. 34 Since one-half of VT cases are due to triggering factors, and genetic factors are key risk factors, it is possible that family testing could reduce the burden of VT. The practice of family testing has likely most influenced the use of prophylactic anticoagulation in pregnancy in affected female relatives, who for some disorders have a VT incidence estimated as high as 4% per pregnancy in the absence of prophylaxis.…”
Section: Family Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the riskfactors behave synergistically, so that a woman, who has FVL and is on the Pill, has a 30-40 fold increased chance of having a DVT, even if this chance is still small in absolute terms (see Middeldorp, 2001, Bauer, 2001). The main reason why individuals are referred to the test for FVL or the other thrombophilia markers is to avoid situations where several risk-factors coincide, such as advising people with the predisposition not to go on the combined Pill and to take special precautions in high-risk situations, such as during long flights, or during and after surgery or pregnancy.…”
Section: Thrombophilia As a Genomic Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%