1999
DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Study of Recurrence Rate and Risk Factors for Recurrence After a First Renal Stone

Abstract: Stones can recur as long as 10 years after the first episode, although the rate is lower than previously reported. The metabolic evaluation after a first stone episode needs to be reappraised in terms of its cost-effectiveness, since recurrences do not seem to be predictable from standard laboratory tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
2
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
112
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study shows that success rate had ahigher range regarding upper calyceal and pelvic stones (70%-90%) compared to 50%-70% success rate for the lower calyceal stones, this finding is similar to data of some previously published studies [2,[5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study shows that success rate had ahigher range regarding upper calyceal and pelvic stones (70%-90%) compared to 50%-70% success rate for the lower calyceal stones, this finding is similar to data of some previously published studies [2,[5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, retained stone fragments following this therapy may reform or compose a nucleus for another stone formation, hence causes a high rate of stone growth [2][3][4][5]. The patient's chances of first episode recurrent stone formation range between 27% and 50% [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of supersaturation with CaOx and/or CaP in categories S res and R mres might be associated with an increased risk of new stone formation [27,34]. Extensive stone formation in category R s also favours a pharmacological approach.…”
Section: © 2 0 0 3 B J U I N T E R N a T I O N A Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Furthermore, the rates of metabolic abnormalities were similar among single stone formers compared to recurrent stone formers. 15,16 Therefore, additional study is needed to further refine the analysis of urinary risk factors to predict stone recurrence. Stone formers can have normal 24-hour urine collections and nonstone formers can have abnormal collections, raising the question of whether current laboratory cutoff parameters are appropriate.…”
Section: Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%