1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1978.tb14908.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Study of Streptokinase and Heparin in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In a prospective trial, 42 medical patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis of less than five days were allocated at random to treatment with streptokinase or heparin. Only patients with extensive thromboses were included. Streptokinase was given in a loading dose of 250000 IU and a maintenance dose of 100000 IU/hour for 4 days as a mean. Heparin was given in a loading dose of 15 000 IU and a maintenance dose of 20000–50000 IU/day. The therapeutic results were evaluated by phlebography. Signi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…opening of occluded veins was accomplished more frequently with catheter-directed thrombolysis alone (90%) [18] or with catheter-directed thrombolysis often followed by adjunct therapy (76%) [9,10,[19][20][21] than with a systemic infusion (28%) [3,[25][26][27] or localregional administration (20%) [3]. Any early thrombolysis also occurred at higher rates with catheter-directed administration [1,18] and catheter-directed administration often followed by adjunct therapy [19,22] than with systemic [3,[23][24][25][26][27] or local-regional [3] administration (Tables I and II). The prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome also was lower, 27%, with catheterdirected administration often followed by adjunct therapy [20][21][22] compared with 57% [3,23] and 72% [3,5] (Table II).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…opening of occluded veins was accomplished more frequently with catheter-directed thrombolysis alone (90%) [18] or with catheter-directed thrombolysis often followed by adjunct therapy (76%) [9,10,[19][20][21] than with a systemic infusion (28%) [3,[25][26][27] or localregional administration (20%) [3]. Any early thrombolysis also occurred at higher rates with catheter-directed administration [1,18] and catheter-directed administration often followed by adjunct therapy [19,22] than with systemic [3,[23][24][25][26][27] or local-regional [3] administration (Tables I and II). The prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome also was lower, 27%, with catheterdirected administration often followed by adjunct therapy [20][21][22] compared with 57% [3,23] and 72% [3,5] (Table II).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any early thrombolysis also occurred at higher rates with catheter-directed administration [1,18] and catheter-directed administration often followed by adjunct therapy [19,22] than with systemic [3,[23][24][25][26][27] or local-regional [3] administration (Tables I and II). The prevalence of postthrombotic syndrome also was lower, 27%, with catheterdirected administration often followed by adjunct therapy [20][21][22] compared with 57% [3,23] and 72% [3,5] (Table II). Any bleeding with catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy alone occurred in 6 of 20 (30%) [1,18] and with catheter-directed followed by adjunct therapy any bleeding occurred in 49 of 163 (30%) [10,[19][20][21][22] compared with 40 of 248 (16%) with systemic infusions [3,[23][24][25][26][27]] and 7 of 146 (5%) with local-regional therapy [3,5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations