2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01922-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Study of Ultrasonographic and FNAC Correlation of Thyroid Swellings with Histopathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FNAC showed a sensitivity of 92.85%, specificity of 94.64%, positive predictive value of 81.25%, and negative predictive value of 98.14% and accuracy of 94.29%. Similar studies [14][15][16] done by other authors showed results which were in accordance with the present study (Tables 7 & 8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…FNAC showed a sensitivity of 92.85%, specificity of 94.64%, positive predictive value of 81.25%, and negative predictive value of 98.14% and accuracy of 94.29%. Similar studies [14][15][16] done by other authors showed results which were in accordance with the present study (Tables 7 & 8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…An FNAC sensitivity of 95.38%, a specificity of 53.33%, a positive predictive value of 86.67% and a negative predictive value of 88.57% were recorded for benign lesions, showing that FNAC is an efficient method to detect these lesions. Similar findings were observed in the study by Bhise et al [ 7 ] and Kumar et al [ 8 ], where the sensitivity of FNAC was observed among 91% and 83.3% of the patients, respectively. The consistency of FNAC thyroid swelling diagnosis in this series was 96.05% [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…More research should investigate the reasons behind these age and gender disparities to improve prevention and treatment strategies. Identical results were found in studies by Rout et al [ 6 ], Bhise et al [ 7 ], and Kumar et al [ 8 ], in which the mean age of the patients was, 36 ± 13 years, 38.32 ± 11.23 years, and 37 ± 12 years, respectively. These studies provide evidence that the average age of patients in this population is around 37 years old, with a standard deviation ranging from 11.23 to 13 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations