2000
DOI: 10.1136/ard.59.6.478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective study of vasculitis patients collected in a five year period: evaluation of the Chapel Hill nomenclature

Abstract: Objective-To test the usefulness of the Chapel Hill nomenclature, supplemented with surrogate parameters, as diagnostic criteria for primary vasculitides. Methods-To prospectively evaluate vasculitis patients according to a standardised clinical and para-clinical programme. In accordance with the Chapel Hill publication surrogate parameters were used: proteinuria, haematuria and red blood cell casts (glomerulonephritis), angiographic or ultrasonic demonstration of aneurysms or stenoses (arteritis), radiologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There has yet to emerge a single, unified system that can be applied to clinical diagnosis. 7,8 For most physicians, cutaneous vasculitis evokes a crop of lower-extremity palpable purpura that correlates histologically with small vessel necrotizing vasculitis. 9 For dermatologists, it would be preferable to devise a classification system dedicated to those vasculitides that present cutaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has yet to emerge a single, unified system that can be applied to clinical diagnosis. 7,8 For most physicians, cutaneous vasculitis evokes a crop of lower-extremity palpable purpura that correlates histologically with small vessel necrotizing vasculitis. 9 For dermatologists, it would be preferable to devise a classification system dedicated to those vasculitides that present cutaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All vasculitis patients were divided into three groups based on the size of the affected vessels following the defi nitions adopted by the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference. 21 Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) was diagnosed on the basis of the criteria proposed by Sorensen and colleagues 22 (n = 14) and was considered small vessel vasculitis (SVV). Polyarteritis nodosa 23 (PAN; n = 7) was considered medium-sized vessel vasculitis (MVV).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorenson et al defined a surrogate biomarker to CHCC definition for glomerulonephritis and granulomatous inflammation intended for clinical practice. On the other hand, the use of a single classification would lead to more unclassified patients and overlapping diagnosis (25).…”
Section: Nomenclature Of Vasculitismentioning
confidence: 99%