A protocol for harvesting biodiversity data from Facebook

Abstract

The expanding use of community science platforms has led to an exponential increase in biodiversity data in global repositories. Yet, understanding of species distributions remains patchy. Biodiversity data from social media can potentially reduce the global biodiversity knowledge gap. However, practical guidelines and standardized methods for harvesting such data are nonexistent. Following data privacy and protection safeguards, we devised a standardized method for extracting species distribution records from Facebook groups that allow access to their data. It involves 3 steps: group selection, data extraction, and georeferencing the record location. We present how to structure keywords, search for species photographs, and georeference localities for such records. We further highlight some challenges users might face when extracting species distribution data from Facebook and suggest solutions. Following our proposed framework, we present a case study on Bangladesh's biodiversity—a tropical megadiverse South Asian country. We scraped nearly 45,000 unique georeferenced records across 967 species and found a median of 27 records per species. About 12% of the distribution data were for threatened species, representing 27% of all species. We also obtained data for 56 DataDeficient species for Bangladesh. If carefully harvested, social media data can significantly reduce global biodiversity knowledge gaps. Consequently, developing an automated tool to extract and interpret social media biodiversity data is a research priority.

Citizen Science in the Philippines: Coastal biodiversity engagements on a small island

“…Most respondents feel that photo documentation is a powerful tool that bridges non-professionals and professionals with scienti c perspectives. CS has been documented to facilitate knowledge on biodiversity conservation (hence reducing the knowledge gap) through photographs shared with online communication platforms (Oliveira et al, 2021;Soltani et al, 2022;Krueger et al, 2023;Chowdhury et al, 2024).…”