1977
DOI: 10.1016/0378-7206(77)90005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prototype approach to information system design and development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• In the strategy of successive prototypes lies a danger of blindness ('tunnel vision' (Sol, 1984), 'model effect' (Bally, et al, 1977). Once the process of development of successive prototypes has started, the danger arises that one is led to elaborate the details of the current prototype instead of questioning its underlying premises.…”
Section: Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• In the strategy of successive prototypes lies a danger of blindness ('tunnel vision' (Sol, 1984), 'model effect' (Bally, et al, 1977). Once the process of development of successive prototypes has started, the danger arises that one is led to elaborate the details of the current prototype instead of questioning its underlying premises.…”
Section: Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of prototyping in systems development emerged in the late 1970's (Bally, Brittan, & Wagner, 1977;Naumann & Jenkins, 1982) as a reaction against more traditional phase-oriented models (e.g. linear models, life-cycle models, waterfall models, etc.)…”
Section: Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CESD acknowledges that concrete activities may contribute to several abstract concerns and that they do so embedded in a related domain context. Viewed on the activity level, CESD is in many ways similar to a number of system development approaches ranging from the original prototyping approach (Bally et al, 1977) to the more current such as STEPS (Floyd et al, 1989), Budde et al's prototyping approaches (Budde et al, 1992), Rapid Application Development (RAD) as exemplified by the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM; (Stapleton, 1997)), M.A.D. , Adaptive Software Development (Highsmith, 2000), Rational Unified Process (Kruchten, 1999), Extreme Programming (XP; (Beck, 1999)), and the Crystal Family (Cockburn, 2001).…”
Section: Experimental System Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of prototyping in systems development emerged in the late 1970's (Naumann & Jenkins 1982, Bally et al 1977 as a reaction against more traditional phase-oriented models (e.g. linear models, life-cycle models, waterfall models etc.)…”
Section: Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…linear models, life-cycle models, waterfall models etc.) of how to develop computer systems (Avison & Fitzgerald 1988, Bally et al 1977, Boehm 1988, Hekmatpour & Ince 1988, Lantz 1986. Two basic problems seem common to most of the critiques:…”
Section: Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%