2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pseudo-rigid-body 2R model of flexural beam in compliant mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models previously defined in literature have been for one specific end being fixed, with loads applied at the other end (see Refs. [17,19], and [20]). This renders those models difficult to use for general design problems, especially for automated design or topology optimization, which is the reasoning behind the symmetry of the model defined in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The models previously defined in literature have been for one specific end being fixed, with loads applied at the other end (see Refs. [17,19], and [20]). This renders those models difficult to use for general design problems, especially for automated design or topology optimization, which is the reasoning behind the symmetry of the model defined in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There has been significant work in this area over the past two decades, although much of it was focused on individual applications rather than toward a generic approach. PRB models have been derived for various types of compliant elements, such as fixed-guided beams [14,15], curved segments [16,17], cross-strip pivots [18], and straight beams under bending [19,20]. Recent work also focused on PRB models for soft joints with extension effects [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the 3R model becomes more complicated owing to the introduction of three pivots. Yu et al [102] reduced the joints and proposed a 2R pseudo-rigid-body model. In addition to the 2R and 3R models, a RPR model considering tensile effects and a 5R model for offsetting inflection points were also developed [103,104,217].…”
Section: Kinetostatic Modeling Of Compliant Mechanisms With Large Defmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, since the prediction accuracy of the pseudorigid-body model is limited in estimating larger end slope of flexible beams, efforts have been focused on improving the performance of the pseudo-rigid-body model by including more parameters, such as the 2R (R denotes a revolute pair), 3R, 5R, and RPR (P denotes a prismatic pair) pseudo-rigid-body models [101][102][103][104]. Moreover, some multi-axis flexure hinges with complex configurations and large deflection, such as the Cartwheel flexure hinge, were analyzed based on the pseudo-rigid-body model [105][106][107].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the concept of PRB, Midha et al (2015) presented a viable method of analyzing a fixed-guided compliant beam with an inflection point for various boundary conditions. To further approximate tip deflection of cantilever beams subject to combined end forces and moments, the PRB 2R (revolute) (Yu et al, 2012) and 3R (Su, 2009) have been explored to improve the analysis accuracy. However these PRB models can only describe bending deformation, without capturing the axial deformation of the beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%