2021
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0120923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PSNR Review of ESTARFM Cloud Removal Method with Sentinel 2 and Landsat 8 Combination

Abstract: Remote sensing images with high spatial and temporal resolution (HSHT) for GIS land use monitoring are crucial data sources. When trying to get HSHT resolution images, cloud cover is a typical problem. The effects of cloud cover reduction using the ESTARFM, one of spatiotemporal image fusion technique, is examined in this study. By merging two satellite photos of low-resolution and medium-resolution images, the Enhanced Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Method (ESTARFM), predicts the reflectance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main step of the STNLFFM is to first construct the transformation relationship between high and low resolution data, filter similar image elements, and then calculate the weight function using the correlation relationship between images for the target image elements (Cheng et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2019). Since the cloud volume of Sentinel‐2A images on 5 April and 15 May is large compared with the cloud volume of images at the rest of the time periods, it is affected by cloud coverage during the fusion process, resulting in a decrease in fusion accuracy (Knauer et al., 2016; X. Li et al., 2019; Tarigan & Isa, 2021), making the predicted results on 24 June with poor correlation with the corresponding time Sentinel‐2A. Meanwhile, the fusion accuracy is correlated with the temporal phase difference within the prediction time period (Lei et al., 2021), and the prediction accuracy degrades if there is a sudden change in the feature within a certain time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main step of the STNLFFM is to first construct the transformation relationship between high and low resolution data, filter similar image elements, and then calculate the weight function using the correlation relationship between images for the target image elements (Cheng et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2019). Since the cloud volume of Sentinel‐2A images on 5 April and 15 May is large compared with the cloud volume of images at the rest of the time periods, it is affected by cloud coverage during the fusion process, resulting in a decrease in fusion accuracy (Knauer et al., 2016; X. Li et al., 2019; Tarigan & Isa, 2021), making the predicted results on 24 June with poor correlation with the corresponding time Sentinel‐2A. Meanwhile, the fusion accuracy is correlated with the temporal phase difference within the prediction time period (Lei et al., 2021), and the prediction accuracy degrades if there is a sudden change in the feature within a certain time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some limitations of ESTARFM when applied to snow-covered mountain areas [ 51 , 52 ]. First, snow reflectance is higher than non-snow pixels in the visible band, which leads to a high threshold of selecting similar pixels, resulting in large errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%