2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40567-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PSO-Based Feature Subset Selection for Application of Spam /Non-spam Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicated that the employment of such mechanisms can improve the accuracy performance. In addition, Zhang et al [25] and Behjat et al [26] introduced the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) into the Internet water army identification problem. These evaluable achievements to a large extent increase the detection accuracy of Internet water armies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated that the employment of such mechanisms can improve the accuracy performance. In addition, Zhang et al [25] and Behjat et al [26] introduced the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) into the Internet water army identification problem. These evaluable achievements to a large extent increase the detection accuracy of Internet water armies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behjat et al [43] used Binary Particle Swarm Optimization as feature selection and Multi-Layer Perceptron as classification and bag of word as extraction; they compare with information gain as feature selection and three classifiers, namely, BP Neural Network, Linear Discriminant and support vector machine. Their proposed output from genetic algorithm and other feature selection of information gain are the feature selection and other classifiers like BP Neural Network, Linear Discriminant and support vector machine.…”
Section: B Supervised Feature Selectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The researchers assumed that feature selection can decrease the number of features [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] in carrying out a comparison between "Harmony Search, genetic algorithm and others mentioned before" of feature selection without detecting the weaknesses of these algorithms for Islamic terrorists' web. They offered a solution for such weaknesses by hybrid [41][42][43][44] with other algorithms and then compared the applied algorithms with another one so as to increase their performance, without addressing the effect with other processes in the web classifiers such as classifiers algorithms and extraction method.…”
Section: Limitations Of Feature Extraction and Term Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLPNN) was proposed for spam email identification in[16].PSO algorithm is used for characteristic selection and MLPNN model is used for training, data testing. In PSO-MLPNN model the perceptron neural function is used with sigmoid activation function for the hidden layer; %80 of the data is used for training and %20 for testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%