Purpose -This paper demonstrates that it is both possible and useful to measure the emotional developmental stage of people with intellectual disability. Design/methodology/approach -A tool was designed, based on a stage theory of development and tested for reliability and validity. Findings -The tool was found to be both reliable and valid. Originality/value -This is new work with no predecessor.Keywords Measurement, Emotional development
Paper type Research paperAfter a long period of expecting behavioural approaches to solve all behavioural problems, there is now a growing recognition that feelings and emotional trauma may underpin behavioural disturbance (Royal College of Psychiatrist, 2004;Jahoda et al., 2001). There is, therefore, a need for an assessment of emotional development that can define and inform therapeutic interventions as well as measure change over time.Behavioural assessments tend to be based on frequency and severity of behaviours labelled as maladaptive for the individual, or the setting in which they live. The purpose of the assessment is to identify the behaviour, the antecedents and consequences, then design an intervention to eradicate or modify the behaviour. These behaviours can be very severe in nature, often involving harm to self or others. Behaviours that are frequent and not too severe, e.g. persistent touching, respond quite well to this sort of intervention. However, behaviours that are low frequency but high intensity are less amenable because there are fewer opportunities to intervene and the consequences of the behaviour could be severe. Individuals with the second pattern may find themselves escalating through services to secure provision because of the severity of what they do. However, usually without an appropriate intervention because of the difficulties of implementing a reinforcement or reward schedule. Some cognitive behavioural treatments are becoming more widely used with people with mild intellectual disability (ID) with some success (Nicoll et al., 2013). However, there is still a complex group for whom cognitive or behavioural approaches have limited usefulness. They frequently find themselves stuck in the secure system, usually because their behaviour is not understood. The emotional component would appear to be the missing link in understanding the meaning of the behaviours and possible intervention.High-frequency -low-intensity behaviours, i.e. those that cause irritation rather than fear, lend themselves better to behavioural interventions in segregated environments (Sturmey, 2008). The ability to engage in such an intervention depends on the skill of the staff group and the motivation of the service-user. It is notable that people who remain in residential services for long periods usually exhibit these types of behaviours. They are still prevented, by their behaviour, PAGE 272 j