1960
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1960.11.2.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Psychophysical Study of “Cuteness”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alley (1981) and Brooks and Hochberg (1960), among others, have shown that incorporation of more youthful features into human faces leads them to be seen both as increasingly cute and more in need of protection. Gould (1979) has observed that as Mickey Mouse's personality was changed over several decades from that of a somewhat nasty character to that of his current lovable self, he was drawn with a progressively more youthful body and face.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alley (1981) and Brooks and Hochberg (1960), among others, have shown that incorporation of more youthful features into human faces leads them to be seen both as increasingly cute and more in need of protection. Gould (1979) has observed that as Mickey Mouse's personality was changed over several decades from that of a somewhat nasty character to that of his current lovable self, he was drawn with a progressively more youthful body and face.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since previous research (Alley, 1983a;Brooks & Hochberg, 1960) has shown that perceived cuteness is influenced by age information and is inversely correlated with perceived age, cuteness ratings were also collected.…”
Section: Study 2 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants whose facial characteristics closely correspond to the Kindchenschema are commonly described as cuter than infants whose facial characteristics deviate from the Kindchenschema (e.g., Alley, 1981;Brooks and Hochbeg, 1960;Glocker et al, 2009a;Hildebrandt and Fitzgerald, 1979;Hückstedt, 1965;McKelvie, 1993;Sternglanz et al, 1977).…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of baby schema features are in the head and the face and most prior research has focused on these infant characteristics (6,7,9,(11)(12)(13). Using anthropometric (26) and morphing techniques, we manipulated photographs of 17 infants [originals courtesy Katherine Karraker, West Virginia University; (11)] to produce high (round face, high forehead, big eyes, small nose and mouth), low (narrow face, low forehead, small eyes, big nose and mouth), and unmanipulated baby schema portraits of each infant (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a species whose young depend on care, such bias could be evolutionary adaptive and enhance offspring survival (3)(4)(5). The behavioral effects of the baby schema have been experimentally confirmed (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), with implications for infant-caretaker interactions (15,16). In ethological terms, baby schema is classified as a ''releaser'' (or ''key stimulus'' in the context of social communication), which is defined as a set of specific stimulus features sufficient to selectively elicit a particular pattern of behavior (2,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%