2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-01080-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A public–private partnership model for COVID-19 diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, there has been recent progress on highly automated workflows for PCR diagnostics [61, 62, 63] that require fewer lab technicians. One example is endpoint PCR [64], which uses a waterbath instead of the more common piezoelectric system, for higher-throughput thermal cycling at lower cost.…”
Section: Implementation Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, there has been recent progress on highly automated workflows for PCR diagnostics [61, 62, 63] that require fewer lab technicians. One example is endpoint PCR [64], which uses a waterbath instead of the more common piezoelectric system, for higher-throughput thermal cycling at lower cost.…”
Section: Implementation Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapidly recruiting skilled technicians when a pandemic is detected is another option, but this would be difficult to do in 1-2 months and only about 1/1000 people are currently employed in the medical diagnostics industry in the US [60]. Alternatively, there has been recent progress on highly automated workflows for PCR diagnostics [61, 62, 63] that require fewer lab technicians. One example is endpoint PCR [64], which uses a waterbath instead of the more common piezoelectric system for higher throughput thermal cycling at lower cost.…”
Section: Appendicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a hypothetical scenario, assuming it requires a single aspiration-dispense cycle with a hypothetical 1 second for each step plus 1 second for pipette movement for the same number of samples, it will require approximately 4.5 hours to execute this single task if a single-channel pipetting instrument is used. Extrapolation of this simple example to systems, which are able to handle up to 14,000 samples per day, outlines a very clear overview of how critical such systems are as throughput increases[24].…”
Section: Research Applications Utilising Automated Liquid Handling De...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactivating buffers have recently been developed for that purpose, allowing for safe NAAT, simultaneously inactivating and preserving clinical samples. An example of such a pathogen inactivating, RNA/DNA stabilizing transport medium for in vitro diagnostic testing using PCR methods is the InActiv Blue medium (InActiv Blue, Beernem, Belgium) [4][5][6][7][8][9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%