2021
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.742817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Public-Private Partnership to Locate Fields for Implementation and Monitoring of Best Management Practices to Treat Legacy Phosphorus

Abstract: Legacy nutrients stored in agricultural soils are a substantial component of riverine nutrient discharge contributing to the eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems. These nutrient loads can persist and delay water quality initiatives, for example, those of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement which seek to reduce phosphorus (P) loads entering the Western Lake Erie Basin. In this watershed, approximately 5% of fields have P concentrations 2.5-fold greater than the maximum agronomic recommendations for corn and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The practice of routing tile effluents to wetlands is not widespread, such that it may be exceedingly optimistic to assume that 100%�or even 50%, for that matter�of tile effluents will be routed to wetlands. Furthermore, while "critical source areas" (i.e., subwatersheds with disproportionally high nutrient yields) 20 are more likely to be prioritized for conservation efforts, the high nutrient source fields within are typically not known 45 or, if they are, the field's owner may be unwilling to add a wetland. We therefore advise that our "random" placement scenarios�which first randomly place wetlands in agricultural HRUs and subsequently randomly place wetlands in non-agricultural HRUs (see Section S11)�are more likely than our "targeted" placement scenarios.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice of routing tile effluents to wetlands is not widespread, such that it may be exceedingly optimistic to assume that 100%�or even 50%, for that matter�of tile effluents will be routed to wetlands. Furthermore, while "critical source areas" (i.e., subwatersheds with disproportionally high nutrient yields) 20 are more likely to be prioritized for conservation efforts, the high nutrient source fields within are typically not known 45 or, if they are, the field's owner may be unwilling to add a wetland. We therefore advise that our "random" placement scenarios�which first randomly place wetlands in agricultural HRUs and subsequently randomly place wetlands in non-agricultural HRUs (see Section S11)�are more likely than our "targeted" placement scenarios.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%