2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Putative Mechanism for Magnetoreception by Electromagnetic Induction in the Pigeon Inner Ear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the absence of clCRY4 homologs in mammals, it is conceivable that other light-sensitive molecules exist that may function as magnetic sensors. It is also important to emphasize that our results do not exclude the presence of complementary light-independent mechanisms that rely on magnetite or alternatively electromagnetic induction ( 45 ). Despite these caveats, our data support a model whereby clCRY4 acts as a UV-blue photoreceptor and/or a light-dependent magnetosensor by modulating glutamatergic synapses between horizontal cells and cones ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Given the absence of clCRY4 homologs in mammals, it is conceivable that other light-sensitive molecules exist that may function as magnetic sensors. It is also important to emphasize that our results do not exclude the presence of complementary light-independent mechanisms that rely on magnetite or alternatively electromagnetic induction ( 45 ). Despite these caveats, our data support a model whereby clCRY4 acts as a UV-blue photoreceptor and/or a light-dependent magnetosensor by modulating glutamatergic synapses between horizontal cells and cones ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Another mechanism based on electromagnetic induction has been acknowledged as the basis of magnetoreception for some marine animals, such as sharks [Kalmijn, 1981], but mostly discarded for land animals. However, recently Nimpf et al [2019] proposed that electromagnetic induction can be the biophysical mechanism involved in magnetoreception of pigeons through the generation of voltages in the semicircular canals of the inner ear. Our results are consistent with those mechanisms because the sensitivity to the magnetic inclination is related to the distribution of cryptochrome chromophores in a spherical eye, creating an inhomogeneous distribution of radical pairs as a function of the angular position on the eye relative to the magnetic field direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fitted turtles in the experimental group with a neodymium magnet (K&J Magnetics, Inc., Pipersville, PA; D41‐N52; 0.38 g; 6.35 mm diameter, 1.59 mm thickness; surface field: 3,309 Gauss, Br max = 14,900 Gauss; Bh max = 52 MGOe) attached to the leading edge of the nuchal scale of the carapace (following Congdon et al., 2015). Placement of the magnets on the carapace—a fixed, rigid mineralized tissue—with epoxy assured that the positions of the magnets did not change throughout the animal's migration and was uniform across all animals in the study, thereby preventing magnet positional changes (Nimpf et al., 2019). Although the exact nature of disruption to the magnetic field can be complex, given that the magnets used were 500–1000 times greater than the strength of the Earth's magnetic field at the surface (range 0.3–0.6 Gauss) and as the magnets were < 5 cm from the center of the turtle's head, we can confidentially say that immediate magnetic field around the head of turtles was disrupted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%