Proceedings of the Second Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware 2010
DOI: 10.1145/2020723.2020740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A QoS ontology cooperated with feature models for non-functional requirements elicitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such models allow identification of needs for improving, increasing, or keeping the level of the quality characteristics of a software. To support systematic identification of goals and qualities within a given domain, ontologies have been developed and used to support requirements elicitation [16,17]. The means-ends relationships that are an inherent part of a goal model make the impact of such a quality requirements explicit [18,19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such models allow identification of needs for improving, increasing, or keeping the level of the quality characteristics of a software. To support systematic identification of goals and qualities within a given domain, ontologies have been developed and used to support requirements elicitation [16,17]. The means-ends relationships that are an inherent part of a goal model make the impact of such a quality requirements explicit [18,19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a telecommunication system, Quality of Service (QoS) requirements are stated that concern system performance, availability, and capacity [17]. Often these requirements are agreed in a service level agreements (SLA) between the system customers and the supplier [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goal-oriented Aspect-oriented Pattern-based • Use-case Questioner [14] • MOQARE [15] • NFRs elicitation model [16] • Actor-based model [17] • Usability catalogue [18] • NFRs Layered Framework [19] • Goal-based requirement extraction [20] • Usability Elicitation Framework [21] • NFR Classifier [22] • Semi supervised text Analysis [23] • QA-Miner [24] • NFR Incorporation Framework [25] • Speech recognition [26] • Experience-based Method [27] • NFRs elicitation Framework [28] • ElicitO [29] • Efficiency usecases [30] • NFR recommendation [31] In goal-oriented elicitation approach, goal-based questionnaire is proposed to extract NFRs by questioning stakeholders [14,15], business process model [16], usecase of domain model [17], and taxonomy [18] in the system development. Goal decomposing [19] and goal analysis [20] methods are proposed to identify stakeholder, generate their expected goals based on developer's knowledge and experience, then decompose the goals into sub-goals and identify NFRs for each sub-goals.…”
Section: Table 1 Elicitation Of Nfrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…meeting minutes, interview notes, and memos). In pattern-based approach, experience-based elicitation [27], domain ontology [28][29][30] are proposed to assist requirements analysts in NFRs elicitation process. Recommendation system [31] is also proposed to understand expected realistic NFRs in the system development.…”
Section: Table 1 Elicitation Of Nfrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROPRE does not rely on the availability of all stakeholders or up-to-date documentation, is applicable in a globalized environment, and goes along with a moderate and feasible time effort. To achieve this goal, it solely relies on abstract feature models [6] of the system under study. Furthermore, we provide performance requirements specification templates to ensure that all relevant attributes of the gathered performance requirements are recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%