20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - Volume 1 (AINA'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/aina.2006.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A QoS ontology language for Web-services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To a lesser extent, also Yeom et al [40], Tsesmetzis et al [41], [42] , E. Maximilien and P. Singh [27], Guimarães [43], and Soomro and Song [44] (with 2 proposals each). It is worth to clarify that this analysis is scoped to the relationship between the quality models in the field of web services.…”
Section: Some Relevant Observations Followmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a lesser extent, also Yeom et al [40], Tsesmetzis et al [41], [42] , E. Maximilien and P. Singh [27], Guimarães [43], and Soomro and Song [44] (with 2 proposals each). It is worth to clarify that this analysis is scoped to the relationship between the quality models in the field of web services.…”
Section: Some Relevant Observations Followmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They did not tend to present a practical approach for real services selection. In [11] and [17], the authors focused on the creation of QoS ontology models, which proposed QoS ontology frameworks aimed at formally describing arbitrary QoS parameters. Additionally, [7] and [9] attempted to conduct a proper evaluation framework and proposed QoS-based service selection, despite the authors failing to present how to validate the effectiveness of such a framework or algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it's problematic that traditional methodologies can effectively and autonomously conduct service discovery and composition in a complex dynamic environment. Moreover, the QoS specifications proposed in the literature (e.g., [11,12,17]) are yet to agree on common defining concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since much work has been done on defining a formal QoS ontology for services [18], [6], we use this property as a placeholder for further extension and integration.…”
Section: Non-functional Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%