2015
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qPCR-based method for detecting parasitism ofFopius arisanus(Sonan) in oriental fruit flies,Bactrocera dorsalis(Hendel)

Abstract: This method is a rapid, sensitive and specific technique to determine the parasitism rate of F. arisanus across all life stages of B. dorsalis, which will be useful to predict parasitoid output from mass rearing and evaluate the outcome of pest suppression after mass release in the field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liang et al . 51 obtained similar results using qPCR, with an egg detection threshold of 0.25 ng for parasitoid DNA [( Fopius arisanus (Sonan)] in 40 ng of host DNA [ Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)], for a dilution ratio of ~0.006. In addition, our detection threshold appeared sensitive enough to detect all the developmental stages of our parasitoids, including embryonic stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liang et al . 51 obtained similar results using qPCR, with an egg detection threshold of 0.25 ng for parasitoid DNA [( Fopius arisanus (Sonan)] in 40 ng of host DNA [ Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)], for a dilution ratio of ~0.006. In addition, our detection threshold appeared sensitive enough to detect all the developmental stages of our parasitoids, including embryonic stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Host larva mortality remains the main limitation for an accurate and reproducible estimation of parasitism rates in the rearing laboratory 52,53 . In this case, DNA metabarcoding is useful for estimating parasitism rates because it can be used to detect parasitoids in the host body, whether the larval parasitoid is alive or dead 51 . For example, we can take the case of S. sahelensis , which was detected by both methods (DNA metabarcoding and rearing), and its detection threshold (~0.001) was low enough to detect all parasitoid stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not find other studies that tried to identify ghost parasitoids in host carcasses weeks after host death, nor did we find studies using MCA to detect and identify parasitoids. The closest method to ours to detect and identify parasitoids was the use of qPCR, in which detection was inferred using the quantification cycle threshold (Cq) method for presence/absence and the specificity assured by the use of species-specific probes (Liang et al, 2015(Liang et al, , 2018 TA B L E 3 Percentage of parasitoids detected by MCA in host carcasses after parasitoid emergence in relation to the total number of parasitoids observed by rearing primer or probe specificity is critically important to ensure that only the desired amplicon is amplified. These authors used the melting curves to confirm the absence of non-specific PCR products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of using species‐specific probes, there is no need to use species‐specific primers (e.g. Liang et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an agricultural ecosystem, insect parasitoids play very important roles in the trophic networks and attract much research for their potential in biological control (Godfray 1994), especially as some species have largely been reared artificially and then released in the fields to suppress the pest populations (Liang et al 2015). Each species kills and lives at the expense of host as a result of its development after ovipositing its egg within or on the surface of the host (Eggleton and Gaston 1990;Rachel et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%