2004
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.20049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A QPSK direct-conversion receiver for wireless communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, ultra-wideband coverage has become more critical, and ultra-wideband receiving systems have a broader application prospect. At present, the commonly used technical solutions for receiver systems are rough as follows: superheterodyne architecture, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] zerointermediate frequency (IF) architecture, [15][16] and low-IF architecture. [17][18] The design of this article uses the superheterodyne architecture as the final technical solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, ultra-wideband coverage has become more critical, and ultra-wideband receiving systems have a broader application prospect. At present, the commonly used technical solutions for receiver systems are rough as follows: superheterodyne architecture, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] zerointermediate frequency (IF) architecture, [15][16] and low-IF architecture. [17][18] The design of this article uses the superheterodyne architecture as the final technical solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, wireless communication systems are developing in the direction of multi‐frequency, broadband, high integrated, and intelligent. There are three mainstream architectures for the implementation of wireless communication transceiver systems: super‐heterodyne transceiver architecture, 5‐6 low‐intermediate frequency (low‐IF) transceiver architecture, 7‐10 and zero intermediate frequency (zero‐IF) transceiver architecture 11‐24 . Super‐heterodyne architectures have large receiving dynamic range, high‐adjacent channel selectivity, and high‐receiving sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%