2018
DOI: 10.1080/17538068.2018.1477445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative analysis of postpartum contraceptive choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These decisions were reinforced by frustrations held about lockdown restrictions on personal freedoms. Rationalisation of breaking guidelines may be explained by cost-benefit analysis [39]. Extended periods of social isolation led to greater negative affect i.e., an increase in perceived barriers to maintaining adherence with social distancing guidelines, which may in turn increase the perceived benefits of breaking guidelines [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These decisions were reinforced by frustrations held about lockdown restrictions on personal freedoms. Rationalisation of breaking guidelines may be explained by cost-benefit analysis [39]. Extended periods of social isolation led to greater negative affect i.e., an increase in perceived barriers to maintaining adherence with social distancing guidelines, which may in turn increase the perceived benefits of breaking guidelines [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most women found the advice and experience of contraception provided by friends and/or family to be highly influential 32 34 35 42 50. Some preferred these sources over professional medical advice as they felt greater comfort sharing personal information, and trusted families not to have ulterior motives such as pharmaceutical sponsorship 32 50. However, some women found discussions with friends or family ‘uncomfortable’ or ‘frivolous’, and questioned the accuracy of information 49.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two review authors (GFS, GSL) used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess confidence in each finding,27–31 based on methodological limitations of studies,28 coherence of the review findings,29 adequacy of the data contributing to a review finding,31 and relevance of the included studies to the review question 32. After assessing each component, a judgement was made about the overall confidence in the evidence supporting the review finding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently to the determination of the method, research points to the seriousness in addressing information essential to the understanding of women about the mechanics related to the contraceptive. It must emphasize that the elucidation of mechanisms of action, adverse effects, and absorption of doubts should be broad and patiently inserted in the context of instructive counseling (6,(23)(24)(25)(28)(29)(30) .…”
Section: Cluster Controlled Randomized Prospective 758 Women 28 Profe...mentioning
confidence: 99%