Decentralization and the Social Economics of Development: Lessons From Kenya 2007
DOI: 10.1079/9781845932695.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative analysis of success and failure factors of agricultural cooperatives in Central Kenya.

Abstract: The study presented in this chapter identified the factors associated with the success and failure of agricultural cooperatives in the liberalized Kenyan rural economy in which government withdrew the administrative and financial support it had previously offered cooperatives and devolved governance authority to cooperative members. It is revealed that the retreat of government resulted in a legal and regulatory vacuum that adversely affected the performance of many cooperatives and facilitated exploitative be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the empowerment of members to improve their quality of life and enhance economic opportunities through self-help is a key goal of most cooperatives (NCBA 2005), more often than not in practice agricultural cooperatives focus on generating greater profits (Barton 2000;Ortmann and King 2007). Even studies that acknowledge cooperative organisations' positive influence on broader social aspects within communities often present these social benefits as secondary to economic benefits (Mayoux 1995;Hoyt 2004;Nyoro and Ngugi 2007). Studies that explore the role of agricultural cooperatives in empowering their women members are particularly limited, but a few exceptions exist (see Oberhauser and Pratt 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even though the empowerment of members to improve their quality of life and enhance economic opportunities through self-help is a key goal of most cooperatives (NCBA 2005), more often than not in practice agricultural cooperatives focus on generating greater profits (Barton 2000;Ortmann and King 2007). Even studies that acknowledge cooperative organisations' positive influence on broader social aspects within communities often present these social benefits as secondary to economic benefits (Mayoux 1995;Hoyt 2004;Nyoro and Ngugi 2007). Studies that explore the role of agricultural cooperatives in empowering their women members are particularly limited, but a few exceptions exist (see Oberhauser and Pratt 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…G enerally, consumers prefer to have high quality, convenient and safe meat products that contain natural flavour and taste (Aymerich et al, 2008). However, these preferences tend to change with increasing urbanization and growing household incomes (Nyoro and Ngugi, 2007). One such trend is preference for lean white meat over red meat (Moschini and Meilke, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many milk collection cooperatives in East Africa have measurement tools that can only measure milk density and freshness. These cooperatives can only refuse the milk that does not meet very simple quality requirements and farmers are not paid based on the quality of their milk (Francesconi, 2009;Nyoro and Ngugi, 2007). When there is no equipment to measure quality, farmers can 'free ride' on the quality of their products.…”
Section: Relations Between Producer Organizations and Their Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%