A qualitative comparison evaluation of the greedy forwarding strategies in Mobile Ad Hoc Network

Al-Shugran, Mahmoud; Ghazali, Osman; Hassan, Suhaidi; Nisar, Kashif; Arif, A. Suki M.

doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.10.008

Cited by 18 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In [12,13] and [16] a performance comparative study was conducted between two types of topology-based routing protocols; on-demand routing protocols DSR, AODV and TORA and table driven protocol DSDV. Considering packet delivery, DSR and AODV perform the best independent of the number of sources.…”

Section: Recent Classification and Comparison Of Manet Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation of Unicast Routing Protocols in MANETs – Current State and Future Prospects

Alnabhan

Alshuqran

Hammad

et al. 2017

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) are considered as a reunion of wireless mobile devices (nodes) that form a temporary wireless network. In order to facilitate communication in MANET, every node has to participate in the routing process. Reaching an optimal route is a fundamental task in MANET, because routes are multi-hoped and susceptible. Several routing protocols exist and can be categorized to; topology-based and position-based routing protocols. However, the efficiency of these protocols in highly dynamic and dense environments is a challenging task to be considered for increasing perceived Quality of Service (QoS) in MANET. This paper focuses on the presentation and basic operation of each category. A performance evaluation study was conducted comparing between both categories in terms of End-to End delay, packet-delivery ratio and routing overhead. Results analysis show that position-based protocols outperforms topology-based protocols in dense and high dynamic environments. Recommendations for implementing future efficient position-based protocols were presented.

show abstract

Section: Recent Classification and Comparison Of Manet Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation of Unicast Routing Protocols in MANETs – Current State and Future Prospects

Alnabhan

Alshuqran

Hammad

et al. 2017

Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, several forwarding mechanisms enhanced packet forwarding by involving new parameters and metrics (e.g. speed and direction [17]) in the next forwarder selection process. However, with all the available enhancement of greedy forwarding, there is still a possibility for packet forwarding problems to occur but with lower probability [9].…”

Section: Forwarding Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Usually the evaluation process (i.e measurement process) at each junction is based on sending information collector packets through roads, in order to collect information about road network and traffic conditions. Junction-based routing has less overhead compared to full path routing [17], as packets only carry the position of the destination and next-intersection. In addition, it adapts more efficiently to variable VANET conditions as routing decision is done sequentially at each junction.…”

Section: Junction-based or Anchor-based Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Traffic aware routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: characteristics and challenges

Darwish

Bakar

2015

Telecommun Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) are gaining tremendous interest among researchers and industries. Although the main reason for developing VANETs is traffic safety, many applications such as traffic status monitoring, road traffic management, routing and distribution of data, have emerged. VANETs exploit multi-hop communications among vehicles to deliver data packets. However, with fast mobility and intermittent link connectivity between vehicles, efficient and reliable routing in VANETs is becoming a challenging task. In order to make routing protocols robust to frequent communication disruptions and aware of unstable traffic and network conditions, several new routing metrics have been integrated with routing protocols. Such protocols are called traffic aware routing (TAR) protocols as their routing decisions are influenced by traffic and network status. The goal of this paper is to review the most recent traffic aware routing protocols while emphasising on traffic and network conditions awareness issues. In addition, this review investigated TAR protocols capabilities and limitations in terms of routing process, routing metrics measurement, forwarding mechanisms and recovery techniques. Moreover, challenges, critical issues and open research problems were discussed in the "Challenges and issues to consider" sections.

show abstract

“…Forwarding using next-junction has less overhead compared to the full path selection [12,13], because forwarding packets only carry the position of the destination and sequence of next-junctions that packets should be passed through. • Next-hop selection: Each node forwards the packet to one of the neighbor vehicles (node) that is close to destination.…”

Section: ) Routing Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are many parameters and policies are involved such as node direction, node speed and so on. Several approaches are proposed by adding some policies for greedy forwarding to overcome the path selection problem [13]. An example of these approaches is to forward the packet to the node that moves toward the destination only, or toward junction, in case of full path selection.…”

Section: ) Routing Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Geographic routing protocol issues in vehicular ad hoc networks

Hanshi

Kadhum

2013

2013 IEEE International Conference on RFID-Technologies and Applications (RFID-TA)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to high mobility and nature of vehicular adhoc environment, routing decisions in such a network are becoming a hard task. Therefore, the routing protocol must be robust to frequent link disruptions and aware of the environment surrounding the network. It is noticeable that routing-based position protocols are more appropriate for high dynamic and fast topology change networks. Many routing protocols have been proposed to enhance the delivery of data packets in a vehicular network. The goal of this paper is to review the current position-based routing protocols, in order to get more insight on the capability of these routing protocols in handling different challenges of vehicular ad-hoc networks.

show abstract

A qualitative comparison evaluation of the greedy forwarding strategies in Mobile Ad Hoc Network

Cited by 18 publications

References 37 publications

Performance Evaluation of Unicast Routing Protocols in MANETs – Current State and Future Prospects

Performance Evaluation of Unicast Routing Protocols in MANETs – Current State and Future Prospects

Traffic aware routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: characteristics and challenges

Geographic routing protocol issues in vehicular ad hoc networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About