2017
DOI: 10.1080/14623730.2017.1345690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative evaluation of professionals’ experiences of conducting Beardslee’s family intervention in families with parental psychosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all domains of the model were covered during the interview by direct or indirect questions, such as those about parent-child interactions on an ordinary day. Another weakness was that the inclusion criteria may have affected the sample and consequently the results as parents included in family interventions generally tend to function better than non-participating parents (Strand and Rudolfsson 2017). Moreover, all participants had completed one of the two interventions, that both aim to open up family communication about parental mental illness and increase awareness of how children are affected by parental mental illness.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all domains of the model were covered during the interview by direct or indirect questions, such as those about parent-child interactions on an ordinary day. Another weakness was that the inclusion criteria may have affected the sample and consequently the results as parents included in family interventions generally tend to function better than non-participating parents (Strand and Rudolfsson 2017). Moreover, all participants had completed one of the two interventions, that both aim to open up family communication about parental mental illness and increase awareness of how children are affected by parental mental illness.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High consensus to talk with parents about their general experience of parenting can be seen to further support this stance, and is something that has proven successful in previous studies of parents with children being seen in an AMH setting (Isobel et al , ). Of note is that there was 91.3 per cent level of agreement that the service user should be encouraged to talk to the child themselves about the nature of their difficulties, although Strand and Rudolfsson () found that their small sample of practitioners observed that some parents were unable to judge what would be appropriate to share, so some support to parents in this process might be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key features of the intervention include promoting open communication about the nature of the mental health issues, positive interactions and a strengthened caretaker role for the parents (Pihkala et al , ). Although this approach was developed primarily in the context of affective disorders, Strand and Rudolfsson () recently carried out a qualitative study to see how the approach might translate in the context of psychosis. Their clinician participants reported benefits for both parents and children but also complexities in engaging certain families in the work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FI is originally designed to prevent depressive symptoms and to promote resilience in the children of affectively ill parents (Beardslee & Podorefsky, 1988). For detailed information about the structure of FI, see Strand and Rudolfsson (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%