A qualitative examination of barriers and solutions to renal transplantation in Malaysia: Key-informants’ perspective

Abstract

Introduction End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing globally, and renal transplantation (RT) is the preferred renal replacement therapy to treat ESRD. Internationally, there are only a few countries with RT rates above 50 per million population (pmp), while most of the countries have RT rates between 30–40 pmp. The low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) makes up the majority for the RT rates below 20 pmp in which Malaysia belongs to despite its increasing ESRD rates. There is a need to explore the barriers to access RT with targeted solutions to improve the RT rates and service in LMIC. Thus, a qualitative study was undertaken in Malaysia to address this issue. Method A qualitative methodological approach was performed between March-May 2018. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore current RT policy and service availability. Key-informants were identified from a detailed stakeholder analysis of RT system in Malaysia. Interviews were digitally audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded with ATLAS.ti software and underwent thematic analysis thoroughly. Results Eight key-informants participated in the study. Barriers and related solutions were classified using the socio-ecological model (SEM). As reported, the barriers and solutions of RT in Malaysia are the results of a complex interplay of personal, cultural, and environmental factors. Key barriers are linked to public’s attitude and perception towards RT and the unaccommodating practices in the healthcare fraternity for RT. Key-informants provided a systematic solution that shed light on how RT could be improved at each SEM level via effective communication, education and inter-agency collaboration. Conclusion The SEM provided a framework to foster a better understanding of current practice, barriers, and solutions to RT in Malaysia. This study is the first to explore the barriers and related solutions to RT comprehensively as a whole. Implications of these findings could prompt a policy change for a better RT service delivery model not just for Malaysia but also for other LMIC. Further stakeholder engagement and evaluation of the systems are required to provide insight into best practices that will help to improve the RT rates and service in Malaysia.

Results of the European EDITH nephrologist survey on factors influencing treatment modality choice for end-stage kidney disease

“…Respondents experienced different barriers to introduce or use certain treatment options in their centre. Consistent with other studies, financial barriers often limited the deployment of HHD and PD and also of LTx and DTx [ 50–52 ], in particular if the treatment was unavailable. Set-up costs for HHD and PD programmes (e.g.…”

“…Furthermore, legislation (e.g. with respect to the consent system, donation after circulatory death or unrelated living donors), lack of coordination, poor infrastructure and limited awareness of organ donation and transplantation among the general public are associated with a shortage of both living and deceased kidney donors [ 47 , 50 , 66 ].…”

Comparing survival in patients with chronic kidney disease across three countries – Results from the study of heart and renal protection‐extended review

“…International comparisons are important in understanding regional variations in clinical practice and patient outcomes, with a Marked differences in the rates of transplantation are well recognized across these three countries, especially in relation to Malaysia 10 and were likely to impact upon mortality comparisons. A sensitivity analysis, adjusting for the competing risk of transplantation in the allcause mortality models, 11,12 revealed little change in the hazard ratios for mortality by country.…”

Concerns and Challenges of Living Donors When Making Decisions on Organ Donation

“…Half of the people who were to decide to donate organs to their loved ones did not do so due to health and safety concerns. [ 16 ] Studies have shown that fear is a significant barrier to living organ donation. Interestingly, this fear may be strongly associated with a lack of knowledge about living organ donation processes and outcomes.…”

“…Gan Kim Soon et al . [ 16 ] believed that participants' occupational discomfort results from a nonsupportive system and workplace restrictions. For instance, employers did not approve medical certificates, so donors were forced to take unpaid sick leave during surgery.…”