2022
DOI: 10.1037/adb0000708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative examination of intentions and willingness for heavy drinking among young adult high-intensity drinkers.

Abstract: Objective: Heavy episodic drinking (HED) and high-intensity drinking (HID) are common in young adulthood but pose unique risks. Quantitative studies have used the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Prototype-Willingness Model (PWM) to understand decision-making processes underlying alcohol misuse. However, our understanding of intentions (plans) and willingness (openness) for HED/HID is in its nascent stages. This study represents the first qualitative examination of relationships between intentions and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We provided similar competing hypotheses for drinking at a friend’s place and ultimately supported our qualitative themes (Stevens, Boyle, et al, 2021) by showing that drinking in this location on a given day, but not on a given occasion, was related to planned drinking. To our knowledge, we are the first to examine this location for these two types of drinking events; thus, more research is needed to determine the replicability of this effect, including whether these findings hold when examining unplanned heavy drinking or drinking more than intended.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We provided similar competing hypotheses for drinking at a friend’s place and ultimately supported our qualitative themes (Stevens, Boyle, et al, 2021) by showing that drinking in this location on a given day, but not on a given occasion, was related to planned drinking. To our knowledge, we are the first to examine this location for these two types of drinking events; thus, more research is needed to determine the replicability of this effect, including whether these findings hold when examining unplanned heavy drinking or drinking more than intended.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Indeed, we originally expected that drinking with friends, strangers/acquaintances, or with larger group of intoxicated people might influence an individual's decision to drink via the social norms of the drinking event. That said, when young adults described intending to drink-at all and regardless of level of consumption-they were most often with friends or around other people, including those who were intoxicated (Stevens, Boyle, et al, 2021). Thus, future research that examines the influence of drinking with friends or intoxicated people on other types of unplanned drinking (e.g., drinking more than intended) may find disparate relations.…”
Section: Social Contexts and Unplanned Versus Planned Drinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fourth, prevention efforts working at multiple levels must include modifying norms and beliefs about drinking behavior [93], including willingness and intention to engage in heavy drinking [3] and drinking contexts [14]. As well, research into emerging areas of neurobiology has led to better understandings of medical intervention models to reduce alcohol and other addictions in adulthood [94].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most often defined as four or more drinks (for women) and five or more drinks (for men) in a relatively short window of time [1], heavy drinking remains a relatively common behavior among older adolescents and young adults, often tapering off after the transition to adulthood [2,3]. Close links are found in the literature between substance use and mental health symptomatology, such as depression, with some cases identifying substance use as a cause and others classifying substance use as an effect [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%