A qualitative examination of the health workforce needs during climate change disaster response in Pacific Island Countries

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a growing body of evidence that the impacts of climate change are affecting population health negatively. The Pacific region is particularly vulnerable to climate change; a strong health-care system is required to respond during times of disaster. This paper examines the capacity of the health sector in Pacific Island Countries to adapt to changing disaster response needs, in terms of: (i) health workforce governance, management, policy and involvement; (ii) health-care capacity and skills; and (iii) human resources for health training and workforce development.MethodsKey stakeholder interviews informed the assessment of the capacity of the health sector and disaster response organizations in Pacific Island Countries to adapt to disaster response needs under a changing climate. The research specifically drew upon and examined the adaptive capacity of individual organizations and the broader system of disaster response in four case study countries (Fiji, Cook Islands, Vanuatu and Samoa).Results‘Capacity’ including health-care capacity was one of the objective determinants identified as most significant in influencing the adaptive capacity of disaster response systems in the Pacific. The research identified several elements that could support the adaptive capacity of the health sector such as: inclusive involvement in disaster coordination; policies in place for health workforce coordination; belief in their abilities; and strong donor support. Factors constraining adaptive capacity included: weak coordination of international health personnel; lack of policies to address health worker welfare; limited human resources and material resources; shortages of personnel to deal with psychosocial needs; inadequate skills in field triage and counselling; and limited capacity for training.ConclusionFindings from this study can be used to inform the development of human resources for health policies and strategic plans, and to support the development of a coordinated and collaborative approach to disaster response training across the Pacific and other developing contexts. This study also provides an overview of health-care capacity and some of the challenges and strengths that can inform future development work by humanitarian organizations, regional and international donors involved in climate change adaptation, and disaster risk reduction in the Pacific region.

Bridging the gap between guidelines and practice in the management of emerging infectious diseases: a qualitative study of emergency nurses

“…Although there is mounting emphasis in the literature on the adaptive capacity of health care institutions and systems, recent studies have suggested that the individual adaptive capacity of workers at the forefront of health care delivery shows increasing importance to organisational effectiveness in coping with contingencies and changed situations in large‐scale health care emergencies (Rumsey et al . ). The findings of this study offer needed insight into strategies to empower the adaptive capacity of frontline emergency nurses in response to public health events.…”

The Effects of Apparent Temperature on Cardiovascular Mortality Using a Distributed Lag Nonlinear Model Analysis: 2005 to 2014

“…1 The health impact of climate change is a concern for public health. 2 Extreme events weather are known to contribute to an increase in morbidity and mortality, particularly in vulnerable groups(eg, the elderly, children, and people with chronic diseases). 3,4 From 1999 to 2009, 7233 heat-related deaths occurred in the United States.…”

Using Implementation Science For Health Adaptation: Opportunities For Pacific Island Countries

“…Nevertheless, many Pacific Island countries face a shortage of trained health staff mixed with high staff turnover rates challenging health adaptation and disaster risk management. 36 A national core team dedicated to climate change and health issues may exist, albeit usually within a broader environmental health portfolio. An overload of information (for example, separate assessments for climate change and health, population health, development, and climate change adaptation) and reporting (for example, large numbers of global and national frameworks with many indicators) 37 can lead to "assessment fatigue" among health care workers and technical working groups.…”