A qualitative investigation of factors influencing participation in bowel screening in New South Wales

Abstract

Issue addressed Bowel cancer is Australia's second biggest cancer killer. Yet, despite the existence of a free national bowel-screening program, participation in this program remains low. The aim of the present study was to understand the current factors contributing to this trend to help inform future strategies to increase participation. Methods Eight focus groups (n=61 in total) were conducted with participants aged 45 years and over from metropolitan and regional New South Wales (NSW). Discussions canvassed awareness, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding bowel cancer and screening, and explored how these factors influenced decisions to screen. Results The low public profile of bowel cancer compared with other cancers, together with poor knowledge of its prevalence and treatability, has contributed to a low perception of risk in the community. Minimal understanding of the often-asymptomatic presentation of bowel cancer and the role of screening in prevention has appeared to compromise the perceived value of screening. In addition, confusion regarding when, and how often, individuals should screen was apparent. Knowledge of bowel cancer and screening, and its role in motivating intention to screen, emerged as a dominant theme in the data. Conclusions The present study highlights specific knowledge gaps and confusion with regard to bowel cancer and screening. Addressing these gaps through the provision of clear, coordinated information may shift attitudes to screening and increase participation. So what? Given the Australian Government's recent commitment to expand the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program, insight into what is driving current perceptions, attitudes and subsequent participation in bowel cancer screening is crucial to the development and targeting of new approaches and initiatives.

Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study

“…The misconception that faeces are handled also needs to be addressed. Dawson et al 28 noted that barriers, such as knowledge gaps and confusion, may be overcome simply by provision of clear information that enables one to form strong reasoning for screening participation. Breast screening participation may benefit from communicating advances in the screening test technology since the early days of mammograms.…”

Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study

“…Instead, respondents were invited to tell their story about their participation in the screening program from beginning to end, while the interviewer would ask 'why' and 'how' questions where appropriate. Subsequently, we used a semi-structured interview guide (Box S1) based on literature to complement the participant narratives with exploration of themes that were potentially related to their non-adherence [14][15][16][17][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Questions were formulated in an open manner and leading questions were avoided.…”

General practitioners’ perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study

“…In Australia, participation in the NBCSP is around 30% [11], although it should be noted that some individuals report screening outside of the NBCSP [14] and are therefore not captured in this figure. Poor participation may be attributable to a range of factors including poor knowledge and awareness [15–17], confusion regarding recommendations and eligible ages which have changed over time [15], and lack of General Practitioner (GP) endorsement [17]. There is however, potential to reduce bowel cancer incidence through a concerted approach to screening.…”