2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11102792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Qualitative-Quantitative Evaluation Model for Systematical Improving the Creativity of Students’ Design Scheme

Abstract: For teaching architectural design, if creativity in students’ practice assignments can be effectively evaluated, it will help make certain the ranking of the performance of different design schemes and provide a critical decision basis for the continuous improvement of each scheme. Based on the review of related literature, this study integrates the grounded theory (GT) from the social sciences’ domain and the method of multiple attribute decision making (MADM) from operations research by analyzing their advan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DEMATEL method responds to the requirement to identify priorities from a systematic perspective rather than by "treating symptoms but not the disease" [47,48]. The DEMATEL method is widely implemented in the creation of sustainable development strategies with causal influence to manage real-world decision-making problems associated with concerns in tourist attraction development [43,49], creative community development [48] and design scheme improvement [50]. The concrete steps are as follows.…”
Section: Constructing the Influential Relationships Among The Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DEMATEL method responds to the requirement to identify priorities from a systematic perspective rather than by "treating symptoms but not the disease" [47,48]. The DEMATEL method is widely implemented in the creation of sustainable development strategies with causal influence to manage real-world decision-making problems associated with concerns in tourist attraction development [43,49], creative community development [48] and design scheme improvement [50]. The concrete steps are as follows.…”
Section: Constructing the Influential Relationships Among The Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INRM established through the DANP method can help to form a variety of systemic causal influential relationship decisions to improve the substitution/objective performance after evaluation. Because of its advantages, this method has been applied in many fields, such as green suppliers [41], information systems [22], teacher improvement [42], quality of life [43], design options [44], and critical infrastructure [45]. The detailed calculation steps of DANP are shown in Appendix A.…”
Section: Danpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, the examination of real problems and the formulation of applicable improvement strategies need to be completed in combination with a dynamic influence and complementary viewpoints. is helps to formulate a systematic improvement strategy starting from the root cause based on the actual situation of the site [21][22][23]. erefore, it is urgently necessary to construct an evaluation framework for evaluating the current situations of green open spaces in downtown residential communities, and clarify the dominant influence relation between the criteria based on criterion weight training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%