A qualitative study exploring nurses’ attitudes, confidence, and perceived barriers to implementing a traumatic brain injury nursing chart in Uganda

Abstract

IntroductionIn Africa, traumatic brain injuries frequently result from road traffic injuries and assaults. Despite limited resources and the high costs of life-saving neurosurgical interventions, secondary brain injury prevention has the potential for improving outcomes. However, nurses and other medical personnel infrequently monitor vital signs, blood sugar, and pulse oximetry and only sporadically re-assess neurological status.MethodsIn one-on-one, semi-structured interviews, 27 nurses from Mulago Hospital’s emergency centre, a tertiary care trauma hospital in Kampala, Uganda, provided feedback regarding a traumatic brain injury-focused education session and use of a nursing chart for detecting secondary brain injury. The interviews explored the nurses’ confidence and perceived barriers to long-term chart implementation and traumatic brain injury care, as well as their ideas for improving this intervention. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded using ATLAS.ti: Qualitative Data Analysis and Research Software (Cleverbridge, Inc., Chicago, USA) and Microsoft Word and Excel (Microsoft Office, Redmond, USA) for thematic content analysis.ResultsKey findings identified in the interviews included the nurses’ attitudes toward the chart and their feelings of increased confidence in assessing and caring for these patients. The main barriers to continuous implementation included inadequate staffing and resources.ConclusionNurses were receptive to the education session and nursing chart, and felt that it increased their confidence and improved their ability to care for traumatic brain injured patients. However, lack of supplies, overwhelming numbers of patients, and inadequate staffing interfered with consistent monitoring of patients. The nurses offered various suggestions for improving traumatic brain injury care that should be further investigated. More research is needed to assess the applicability of a standardised traumatic brain injury nursing education and chart in a broader context.

Trauma unit admissions at the Ugandan National Referral Hospital: a descriptive study

“…This is common in clinical practice, where details are not recorded and the patient is registered as ‘unknown’. However local studies performed have shown that lack of supplies, overwhelming number of patients, and inadequate staffing also interfere with consistent monitoring and documentation of patients records 17 .…”

Trauma unit management and outcomes at an urban tertiary hospital in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive study

“…This we think was reflected in the high unknown disposition of almost half of the patients after initial stabilization in the unit, though also some of the patients lacked all information because commonly where details are not recorded especially for “john Doe's” the patient is registered as ‘unknown’. We think this will be a long standing challenge that MNRTH management has to tackle too because local studies have shown that lack of supplies, overwhelming number of patients, and inadequate staffing also interfere with consistent monitoring and documentation of patient's records 15 . This we think may have affected crucial timely interventions that needed to be done hence contributing to the critical events that occurred like seizures and cardiac arrests which eventually had an impact on outcomes of study patient's managed in the unit.…”

Impact of nursing education and a monitoring tool on outcomes in traumatic brain injury

“…At the time of this study 30–33 nurses working 8-hour shifts staffed the EC. The number of nurses on shift varies from one to four per shift [ 21 ]. Patients typically spend the first 24–48 h, if not longer, in the EC while they await imaging and review by consultants.…”